A man who wants to make sure people are safe made a video showing that Tesla cars can be AIgerous. He said the cars don't pay attention to things like kids crossing the road or school buses stopping. The group he leads showed the video during a big football game. They want Tesla to fix these problems, but the company says it's not their fault because people should read the manual. Read from source...

1. The headline is misleading and sensationalized, as it implies that Tesla vehicles are actively trying to harm people, which is not true. Tesla's full self-driving (FSD) software may have some flaws and limitations, but it does not intentionally or maliciously cause accidents or fatalities. The founder of the Dawn Project is using hyperbole and fear-mongering to draw attention to his agenda, rather than presenting objective facts and evidence.

2. The source of the article, Benzinga, is a financial news platform that may have a vested interest in sensationalizing Tesla's issues, as it could negatively affect their stock price and market value. This could compromise the credibility and objectivity of the information presented in the article, as they may be biased towards creating negative headlines to attract more readers and investors.

3. The Dawn Project's claims that Tesla's FSD software will hit a child crossing the road, blow past stop signs on school buses, or ignore temporary road signs are not supported by concrete data or scientific tests. These accusations seem to be based on assumptions and hypothetical scenarios, rather than actual empirical evidence. The Dawn Project may have conducted some experiments with Tesla's FSD software, but they do not provide sufficient details or methodology to verify their results and conclusions.

4. The article mentions that the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is "furious" about the findings of the Dawn Project, but does not mention any official statements or investigations by the NTSB. This could imply that the NTSB has no authority or credibility to challenge Tesla's FSD software, which may not be true. The article also implies that Tesla has escaped liability for deaths related to FSD by misleading drivers in their manuals, but does not provide any legal evidence or cases to support this claim.

5. The article focuses on the negative aspects and potential risks of Tesla's FSD software, while ignoring its positive features and benefits. For example, it does not mention that FSD can improve road safety by reducing human errors, enhancing traffic efficiency, or promoting environmental sustainability. It also does not acknowledge the ongoing improvements and updates to FSD software based on real-world data and feedback from Tesla's fleet of vehicles.

6. The article uses emotional language and tone, such as "drunk teenager", "will try to kill you", or "crash and die". These words evoke strong feelings of fear, anger, or pity in the readers, rather than encouraging rational and critical thinking. This could manipulate

Based on the article, it seems that Tesla is facing some serious safety concerns regarding its full self-driving software (FSD). The Dawn Project, a safety advocacy group, claims to have proven that FSD drives like a drunk teenager and can potentially hit children, ignore stop signs, and blow past school buses. This could lead to legal issues and reputational damage for Tesla, as well as impact the company's stock price.

Investment recommendation:
- Consider shorting TSLA shares or investing in put options on the stock, given the potential risks associated with FSD safety concerns and their impact on Tesla's business and reputation.

Risk management:
- Monitor developments related to FSD safety and regulatory actions against Tesla. Keep an eye on news reports, lawsuits, and investigations that may affect the company's stock price.
- Consider setting stop-loss orders or limiting your exposure to TSLA shares or put options if you are concerned about potential market volatility due to FSD safety concerns.