The "cached" feature on Google Search let you see what a website looked like in the past. But they stopped using it. There are other websites that can show you how a site changed over time. These websites can also let you compare different versions of a page. You might want to use them if you're interested in seeing how a website has changed or if you need an older version of a page that is not available anymore. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalist, as the cached feature was not killed but only removed from Google Search's mobile app. It still exists in the desktop version and other Google products like Google Images.
- The article does not provide a clear definition or explanation of what the cached feature is or how it works. It just assumes that the reader already knows and implies that it is something essential and indispensable for web research.
- The article compares the cached feature with other alternatives, but only mentions one: the Wayback Machine. It does not consider other possible sources of information, such as screenshots, archives, or copies made by users or websites themselves. It also does not evaluate the accuracy, reliability, or relevance of these alternatives in relation to the cached feature.
- The article uses emotional language and exaggeration, such as "killed", "gone", "sad", "miss", etc., to appeal to the reader's sentiment and create a negative tone. It also implies that Google is making a mistake or harming its users by removing the feature, without providing any evidence or arguments to support this claim.
- The article does not provide any sources or citations for the information it presents, such as when it claims that the cached feature was "launched in 2001" or that it was used by "millions of people every day". It also does not acknowledge any counterarguments or opposing views on the topic.
- The article ends with a promotion for Benzinga's other content and services, which is irrelevant to the main topic and seems to be an attempt to generate more traffic and revenue from the readers.