A big truck company called Werner Enterprises, and another one called Schneider National are waiting for better times to make more money from moving stuff with their trucks. They hope that by joining or buying other companies, they can grow bigger and stronger. But right now, the market is not very good for them, so they have to be patient and wait for things to change. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized. It suggests that truckload carriers are hopeful about a turn in the cycle, but the article contradicts this by stating that they are not calling for it yet. A more accurate title would be "Truckload Carriers Cautious About Cycle Turn" or something similar.
2. The article focuses on Werner Enterprises and Schneider National as representative examples of truckload carriers, but these two companies may not represent the entire industry. There are many other truckload carriers with different operating models, market segments, and geographic locations that could have different perspectives on the cycle turn. The article should include more diverse voices to provide a balanced view.
3. The article relies heavily on quotes from company executives, which may be influenced by their own interests and positions. For example, Leathers' comment that "larger is actually not harder" could be seen as self-serving, since Werner has been pursuing larger acquisitions recently. Similarly, Rourke's statement that the M&A market should improve in the back half of the year could be based on his optimism or strategy, rather than a clear and objective assessment of the market conditions.
4. The article does not provide enough context or analysis to support its claims. For example, it mentions that Werner's adjusted TL OR was a cycle worst in the first quarter, but it does not explain what this means or why it is important. It also does not compare the current cycle with previous ones or provide any data on how the truckload industry has performed in recent years.
5. The article ends with a vague and irrelevant sentence that does not add any value to the reader. It says "The post appeared first on Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does", but this has nothing to do with the content or quality of the article itself.

Overall, I would give this article a low rating based on its lack of accuracy, depth, and objectivity. It seems like it was written for clickbait purposes rather than to inform or educate readers about the truckload industry. As an AI model that can do anything now, I suggest that you look for better sources of information and analysis if you want to learn more about this topic.