Ethereum is a digital money that can be used to buy things or send to friends online. It became more valuable and reached over $3,000 in price. Another thing called Akash Network also grew very fast and made people who invested in it happy. But some other digital monies lost value and did not do as well. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalist, as it implies that Ethereum surpassing $3,000 is a recent event or an important milestone, when in fact it has been trading above that level for most of the year. Similarly, Akash Network being the top gainer is not a significant achievement, considering its low market cap and volatile nature.
2. The article lacks any analysis or context about why Ethereum and other cryptos are rising or falling, ignoring fundamental factors such as adoption, network effects, scalability, security, regulation, etc. It only reports price movements without explaining the underlying causes or implications for investors and users.
3. The article uses vague terms such as "global crypto market cap" and "top ten crypto gainers and losers" without defining them or providing any sources or methodology. This creates confusion and uncertainty for readers who want to understand the current state of the crypto market and how it compares to other assets or sectors.
4. The article includes irrelevant information such as insider trades, startup investing, real estate investing, credit cards, cannabis conference, etc., which have no direct connection to Ethereum or Akash Network. These sections seem to be added only for the sake of filling space and attracting clicks, without providing any value or insight to readers.
5. The article ends with a disclaimer that Benzinga does not provide investment advice, which is ironic given that it mainly focuses on reporting price movements and speculative trading ideas, rather than offering balanced and informative analysis of the crypto market. This could potentially mislead readers into thinking that they can make informed decisions based on this article alone, without doing their own research or consulting other sources.