A big company named Microsoft has a website called LinkedIn where people can talk to each other and find jobs. Some people found out that LinkedIn was using their information to make a computer smart, before telling them about it. People got upset because they thought LinkedIn should have asked them first. The big company fixed it by updating their rules, but some people still don't like it. Read from source...

The article is structured to address the headline issue first before providing the necessary background and context to the issue. This is an effective way of hooking readers into the story. However, it lacks clarity on who the affected users are and what implications this has on their data privacy. Additionally, the article does not thoroughly explain how LinkedIn's AI models work and what benefits they bring to the platform. There is also an absence of counterarguments or different perspectives on the issue. The language used in the article is straightforward and easy to understand, which makes it accessible to a wide range of readers. The use of a step-by-step guide to opt out of data scrapping is a helpful addition for readers who want to take action.