What this article is saying:

Some people with a lot of money are buying options for SoFi Techs, a company that helps people with their finances. Most of them are betting that the company's stock price will go up, but a few think it will go down. They are doing this by buying calls (options that let them buy the stock at a certain price) and puts (options that let them sell the stock at a certain price). The article also talks about the company's recent performance and what some experts think about its future. Read from source...

Key points:
- The article is a promotional piece for Benzinga Pro, a paid service that provides market analysis and alerts
- The article claims that whales with a lot of money are bullish on SoFi Techs, based on options history and trades
- The article provides some details on the options trades, such as the strike price, the volume, the open interest, the sentiment, the expiration date, the ask and the bid prices
- The article also provides some background information on SoFi Techs, a financial-services company that offers various products and services
- The article ends with some expert opinions on SoFi Techs, such as ratings, price targets, and recommendations
- The article does not provide any critical analysis, evidence, or sources to support its claims or opinions
- The article uses emotional language, such as "bullish", "big picture", "decoding", "whales", "bullish", "smart investing", etc. to appeal to the emotions and curiosity of the readers
- The article has several grammatical and punctuation errors, such as missing commas, periods, spaces, and capitalization
- The article has an unclear structure, with multiple headings, subheadings, bullet points, and images that make it hard to follow and understand

Summary:
The article is a biased and poorly written promotional piece for Benzinga Pro, a paid service that provides market analysis and alerts. It tries to persuade readers to sign up for the service by claiming that whales with a lot of money are bullish on SoFi Techs, a financial-services company, and by providing some options trades and background information on the company. However, the article does not provide any critical analysis, evidence, or sources to support its claims or opinions. It also uses emotional language and has several grammatical and punctuation errors. The article is not trustworthy or informative.