A group of people who work with money, called traders, are very worried about a possible race between two people for the president in 2024. They are so worried that they use a special tool to show how scared they are and it is showing very high levels of fear. The two people they are worried about are Trump and Biden, who already had a big competition to become president in 2020. Some people think Trump will win again in 2024. Read from source...

- The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Wall Street is gripped by unprecedented anxiety because of a possible Trump-Biden rematch in 2024, but does not provide any evidence or data to support this claim. It also assumes that such a rematch is likely, which may not be the case depending on various factors and events.
- The article relies heavily on anecdotal information and stock performance of companies related to Trump, without considering the broader implications for the economy, markets, or policy. It also ignores other potential candidates and their impact on Wall Street sentiment. This creates a narrow and biased perspective that does not reflect the complexity and diversity of opinions in the financial sector.
- The article uses emotional language and phrases such as "unease", "alarmingly high level of anxiety", "substantial gap", and "soar" to convey a sense of urgency and drama, which may appeal to some readers but also distorts the reality of the situation. It does not provide any objective or rational analysis of the factors that may contribute to the volatility in the market or the uncertainty among traders.
- The article cites unreliable sources such as Business Insider and Real Clear Politics, which are known for their partisan and sensationalist reporting. It also uses Benzinga Neuro, a tool that claims to measure the emotional response of readers to news articles, without explaining how it works or what it means. This undermines the credibility and accuracy of the article and raises questions about the motives and agendas behind it.
- The article ends with a disclaimer that Benzinga does not provide investment advice, which may imply that some of the information or opinions presented in the article are not suitable for informing investment decisions. This may also create confusion and misinformation among readers who may mistake the article for a legitimate source of financial analysis and guidance.