Goldman Sachs is a big bank that helps people and companies with their money. They are going to tell everyone how much money they made in the first three months of this year, which is called Q1. Some smart people who study these things think Goldman Sachs will make less money than they did last year in the same time period. These smart people also guess that Goldman Sachs will bring in more money from their businesses than they did last year.

Goldman Sachs has a part of their company called Asset Management, which helps take care of other people's money and invest it wisely. They want to grow this part of their company and have more money invested under their care in the next five years. Goldman Sachs shares are pieces of the company that people can buy and sell, like trading cards. The price of these shares went down a little bit on Friday. People who want to know what other smart people think about how good or bad these shares are can look at something called Benzinga Pro. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalist, as it implies that the lower earnings are a negative surprise or a problem for Goldman Sachs, when in fact they are expected by analysts and reflect normal market fluctuations. A more accurate title would be "Goldman Sachs to Report Lower Q1 Earnings; Analysts Expect No Major Surprises".
2. The article uses vague and unsubstantiated terms like "recent forecast changes" and "most accurate analysts", without providing any evidence or sources for these claims. It is unclear who are the most accurate analysts, how their predictions have been verified, and what criteria they used to make them.
3. The article mentions that Goldman Sachs shares fell 2% on Friday, but does not provide any context or explanation for this drop. Is it due to lower earnings expectations? Other market factors? A specific event or news? Without knowing the cause, the impact of this share price change is unclear and may be irrelevant to the main topic of the article.
4. The article ends with a promotional pitch for Benzinga's services, which seems out of place and unprofessional. It also does not offer any value or benefit to the readers, who are already presumably interested in Goldman Sachs and its earnings report. Instead, it may alienate them by appearing as a self-serving advertisement.
5. The article lacks any analysis or insight into the underlying factors that may affect Goldman Sachs' performance, such as its business strategy, competitive advantage, market trends, regulatory environment, etc. It simply reports the numbers and opinions of others, without adding any value or perspective to them.

Neutral

Summary of the article: The article discusses Goldman Sachs' upcoming Q1 earnings report and how analysts expect a decrease in both earnings per share and revenue compared to the previous year. It also mentions the expansion plans of the company's Asset Management arm. Finally, it provides information on where readers can find the latest analyst ratings.

Sentiment analysis: The overall sentiment of the article is neutral as it presents both positive (expansion plans) and negative (lower earnings and revenue) aspects of Goldman Sachs' performance without leaning towards either side.