Elon Musk is the boss of a car company called Tesla that makes electric cars. He wants a famous rich man named Warren Buffett to buy some shares in his company because he thinks it's a good idea and will make him more money. But Warren Buffett doesn't like to buy things that cost a lot of money even if they might grow later, that's why he hasn't bought Tesla yet. Elon Musk keeps asking him anyway. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and clickbait-like: "It's An Obvious Move:" Elon Musk Nudges Warren Buffett Again To Take Position In Tesla — Here's Why That May Not Happen Soon." It implies that the move is obvious for Buffett, but it doesn't explain why it might not happen soon. A more accurate title could be "Elon Musk Persists in Pitching Berkshire on Tesla Investment - But Will Warren Buffett Bite?"
2. The article starts with a quote from Elon Musk that seems out of context and irrelevant to the main topic: "I have a lot more confidence in the public than I have in the pundits." This quote does not provide any insight into the potential investment or the reasons behind Berkshire's reluctance.
3. The article mentions an unsuccessful meeting between Musk and Charlie Munger in 2009, but it doesn't provide any details about what happened during that meeting or why it was unsuccessful. This information could be helpful to understand the history and dynamics between Tesla and Berkshire.
4. The article cites Buffett's praise for Musk as a brilliant guy who dreams big, but it does not explore how this admiration translates into an investment decision. Does Buffett respect Musk's vision but disagree with his valuation or growth strategy? Or is he simply acknowledging Musk's achievements without considering Tesla as a potential investment?
5. The article presents the rationale behind Berkshire's lack of interest in Tesla as stemming from its value investing philosophy, but it does not explain how this philosophy differs from other types of investing or why it is incompatible with Tesla's business model and prospects. A more balanced approach would be to present both sides of the argument and analyze their merits and limitations.
6. The article quotes Gary Black, a Tesla investor, who claims that Berkshire might never invest in Tesla because it is not aligned with its growth investing mindset. However, this statement contradicts Buffett's own words, where he said he was open to investing in innovative companies that have "something going for them." This inconsistency raises questions about the credibility and accuracy of the article.
7. The article ends with a vague statement from Buffett about zero-emission vehicle companies as an investment option, without providing any details or indications of his interest level. It leaves the reader wondering what Buffett's actual stance is on Tesla and other EV stocks.

Neutral
Explanation: The article does not express a strong opinion or bias towards Tesla. It acknowledges the achievements of Elon Musk and the company but also explains why Berkshire Hathaway might not invest in it due to its value investing philosophy. The article presents both sides of the story, making the sentiment neutral.