So, Jeff Bezos is the person who started Amazon, a big online store where you can buy many things. At first, they only sold books, but then they added more things like music and videos. Then, Jeff had an idea to ask some people what else they wanted to buy online. One person said they wished Amazon sold windshield wiper blades for their car. This made Jeff think that they could sell anything if they asked customers what they want. So, Amazon started selling more things like electronics and toys. Now, Amazon is a huge store where you can find almost anything you want online. Read from source...

- The title of the article is misleading and clickbait, as it suggests that Bezos revealed some specific strategy or plan for Amazon's "Sell Everything" approach, when in reality he only shared a personal anecdote about customer feedback. This creates a false impression of novelty and importance for a trivial detail.
- The article uses vague terms like "long-tailed" to describe the customer responses, without explaining what they mean or how they influenced Bezos' decision making. This makes it hard for readers to understand the logic behind Amazon's expansion into various categories and products.
- The article repeats the same information multiple times, such as mentioning Bezos' email to customers, his realization that Amazon could sell anything, and the company's vision evolution. This is redundant and unnecessary, as it does not add any value or depth to the story. It also shows a lack of editing and coherence in the writing.
- The article includes irrelevant details, such as Bezos' ranking on the Bloomberg Billionaire Index and his net worth increase last year. These are not related to the main topic of Amazon's "Sell Everything" strategy or how it was shaped by customer feedback. They also serve no purpose other than to appeal to readers' curiosity about Bezos' wealth and status, which is unrelated to the article's theme.
- The article ends with a promotion for Benzinga's Tech Trends newsletter, which is inappropriate and intrusive in an otherwise informative article. It also implies that the article was not written as a standalone piece, but rather as a teaser or advertisement for the newsletter. This undermines the credibility and quality of the article.