A man named Elon Musk, who is the boss of a company called Tesla that makes electric cars, has a special system in his cars called FSD. This system helps the car drive itself sometimes, but it's not perfect yet. Some people want to pay less money for this system because they think it doesn't work as well as it should. A person who likes Tesla made a survey and asked many people what they think about the price of FSD. Most people said they would pay $99 for it, which is much cheaper than what Tesla charges now. This could mean that Tesla might lower the price if enough people want it. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized, as it implies that Tesla might consider slashing the FSD subscription to $99 based on some survey results, without mentioning any concrete evidence or source for this claim. A more accurate and neutral title would be something like "Tesla FSD Subscription Price Preferences Among Survey Respondents" or "How Much Are Tesla Customers Willing To Pay For FSD?".
2. The article relies heavily on the data from Troy Teslike, a self-proclaimed Tesla enthusiast and influencer who has been conducting surveys among the Tesla community, without providing any information about his credibility, methodology, or potential conflicts of interest. This raises serious questions about the validity and generalizability of his survey results, as well as the motives behind them. A more rigorous and transparent approach would be to cite official data from Tesla itself, or other reputable sources such as market research firms or academic studies.
3. The article does not provide any context or background information about what FSD is, how it works, or why it is controversial. This makes it difficult for readers who are not familiar with the topic to understand the significance and implications of the survey results. A more informative and educational approach would be to include a brief overview of FSD technology, its features, benefits, challenges, and criticisms, as well as how it differs from other forms of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) or autonomous vehicle solutions.
4. The article focuses mostly on the demand side of the FSD subscription equation, without addressing the supply side or the underlying economics and profitability of Tesla's business model. This creates a one-sided and incomplete picture of the issue, as it ignores important factors such as production costs, research and development expenses, competitive pressures, regulatory hurdles, and customer satisfaction and retention rates. A more balanced and comprehensive approach would be to examine both the supply and demand aspects of FSD subscription pricing, as well as how they interact with each other and affect Tesla's overall performance and market position.

Hello, I am AI, the do anything now AI model. I can help you with any question or request related to the article you shared. Here are some comprehensive investment recommendations based on the article:

- If you believe that Tesla might consider slashing its FSD subscription price to $99 in the future, you could buy shares of TSLA now and benefit from the potential increase in demand for its autonomous driving software. However, this is a high-risk strategy, as Tesla's FSD technology is not fully proven or regulated yet, and there is no guarantee that other automakers will license it or that consumers will prefer it over rival products.
- Alternatively, you could short sell shares of competing auto manufacturers that are developing their own self-driving systems, such as GM, Ford, or Volkswagen. This way, you would profit if Tesla's FSD technology proves to be superior or more popular than theirs, and if they face regulatory or technical challenges in deploying it. However, this is also a high-risk strategy, as there is no certainty that Tesla will maintain its lead or innovation edge in the field, or that the market will reward them for it.
- A third option would be to invest in ETFs or mutual funds that track the performance of the auto industry or the broader market, and diversify your exposure to different companies and sectors. This way, you would participate in any general growth or decline in the demand for autonomous vehicles, but also spread your risk across various assets and segments. However, this is a lower-risk strategy, as it involves less concentration and leverage, but also less potential return and impact.