So, there is this big company called Microsoft and they gave a lot of money to another company called OpenAI that makes cool chatbots like ChatGPT. Some people think that giving so much money to OpenAI might not be fair for other companies who also want to make chatbots or do similar things. So, there are two groups in the government - the Justice Department and FTC - who are trying to figure out if Microsoft is doing something wrong by helping OpenAI so much. They want to check if this partnership is making it harder for others to compete with them. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Microsoft is facing potential legal investigations by the DOJ and FTC over its investment in OpenAI, but it does not mention the actual reason for the probes, which are antitrust concerns related to their partnership. A more accurate title would be something like "Microsoft's Investment And Partnership With OpenAI May Trigger Antitrust Investigations".
- The article uses vague and ambiguous language throughout, such as "could result in future investigations", "both agencies want to go after the partnership", and "one factor in the antitrust concerns". These phrases do not provide clear or concrete information about the status of the probes, the nature of the alleged violations, or the evidence supporting them. A more informative and precise writing style would be preferable.
- The article relies on a single source, Politico, for its claims, without mentioning any other corroborating or conflicting sources. This raises questions about the credibility and reliability of the information presented, as well as the potential bias or motive behind the reporting. A more balanced and comprehensive approach would involve citing multiple sources and presenting different perspectives on the issue.
- The article mentions some irrelevant or distracting details, such as the hiring of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman by Microsoft days after he was fired by OpenAI, without explaining how this is related to the antitrust concerns or the partnership. This could be seen as an attempt to create drama or controversy, rather than providing factual and relevant information. A more focused and coherent argument would avoid unnecessary digressions and ad hominem attacks.

Possible answer: The sentiment of the article is negative for Microsoft and OpenAI. This is because they are facing potential investigations from both the FTC and DOJ over antitrust concerns related to their partnership and investment in each other. This could harm their reputation and market position, as well as lead to legal consequences or penalties. The article also mentions some controversial decisions made by Microsoft and OpenAI, such as hiring Sam Altman after firing him from his previous role at OpenAI, which adds to the negative perception of the companies.