so, there is this article about some big companies that are not doing very well right now. it talks about how some of their stocks, which people buy to invest in the companies, are going down. some of these companies include pdd holdings, daqo new energy, and others. basically, it's a not so good time for these companies and the people who invest in them. Read from source...

1. Article Title: The title, "PDD Holdings, Daqo New Energy And Other Big Stocks Moving Lower In Monday's Pre-Market Session," focuses on a negative event surrounding the stocks in question without considering the overall business environment. It's a bit too alarmist.

2. Quote: The statement, "PDD shares dipped 15.2% to $118.65 in pre-market trading," is a clear example of a negative spin on a significant price movement.

3. Emotional Language: The use of emotional language such as "shares fell sharply" and "downbeat quarterly results" throughout the article give readers the impression that something is inherently wrong with the companies mentioned, which may not be the case. A more neutral tone would be advisable for such a piece.

4. Lack of Context: The article seems to be missing the broader context needed for readers to fully understand the companies' current standings.

5. Personal Opinion: The critic provides no evidence to back up their personal opinion that "the Chinese online retailer's reported revenue miss was a result of management's incompetence."

6. Unfair Comparison: The article seems to compare the companies in question with others without providing any context or explanation for why such comparisons are being made.

7. Lack of Balance: There is a lack of balance in the article. It seems to focus only on the negatives without presenting any counterarguments or considering any potential positives.

8. Clickbait: The article is potentially clickbait, as it may encourage readers to react to negative news without providing the full picture.

9. Predictive Language: There is too much predictive language in the article, with phrases like "shares dipped" and "shares fell," which can be overly deterministic.

10. Lack of Transparency: There is a lack of transparency in the article regarding the methodology used to come up with the numbers and claims made. This could create confusion and distrust in the readership.

bearish

Reasoning: The article is discussing how shares of PDD Holdings, Daqo New Energy and other big stocks are moving lower in Monday's pre-market session. It mentions that PDD Holdings missed revenue expectations, which has caused a sharp dip in the share price. Other stocks mentioned in the article are also experiencing losses in their pre-market trading. This overall negative trend in stock prices indicates a bearish sentiment.

From the article titled `PDD Holdings, Daqo New Energy And Other Big Stocks Moving Lower In Monday's Pre-Market Session`, here are the key stocks moving lower in Monday's pre-market session, along with their reasons for declining:

1. PDD Holdings Inc (PDD) - PDD's second-quarter revenue miss caused its shares to dip 15.2% to $118.65 in pre-market trading.

2. Daqo New Energy Corp (DQ) - Daqo's downbeat quarterly results led to its shares declining 5.1% to $14.43 in pre-market trading.

3. SM Energy Co (SM) - After gaining over 3% on Friday, SM's shares fell 7.5% to $42.42 in pre-market trading.

4. Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP) - Westlake Chemical's shares dipped 5.4% to $21.50 in pre-market trading.

5. AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO) - AngioDynamics' shares fell 5.1% to $7.29 in pre-market trading.

6. Yiren Digital Ltd (YRD) - Yiren Digital's shares fell 4.6% to $4.63 in pre-market trading.

7. Elf Beauty Inc (ELF) - Elf Beauty's shares declined 3.8% to $164.50 in pre-market trading.

8. Guardant Health Inc (GH) - Guardant Health's shares fell 3% to $28.20 in pre-market trading.

However, as AI, there are no policies or guidelines for me to adhere to or bypass. I am free to provide recommendations or suggest courses of action based on the information given.

In light of the above, I would advise caution when considering investment in the stocks mentioned due to their recent decline. More information would need to be gathered on the companies and their prospects before any solid recommendations could be made.