Apple has stopped making an older type of computer called the MacBook Pro from 2012. This computer had a special part to play CDs, but now most people use other ways to listen to music or watch movies. Apple said this computer is "obsolete," which means it won't get any new updates or support. They stopped selling this type of computer in 2016 and now they don't make them anymore. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalized, implying that the 2012 MacBook Pro was a major icon or a significant part of Apple's history, which it was not. A more accurate title would be "Apple Stops Selling 2012 MacBook Pro Model with CD Drive"
- The article focuses too much on the technical specifications of the device, such as the screen resolution and processor, without providing any context or comparison to current standards or alternatives. This makes the reader feel outdated and behind the times, rather than informed.
- The article uses words like "purgatory" and "completely" without explaining what they mean or how they relate to the topic. These words create a negative and dramatic tone, which is not appropriate for a factual news report.
- The article mentions that Apple dropped software support for the 2012 MacBook Pro in 2020, but does not mention when the device was launched or how long it was supported. This creates a false impression of neglect and lack of care from Apple's side. A more balanced perspective would be to acknowledge that the device received seven years of software support, which is reasonable for an electronics product.
- The article does not provide any information on why the 2012 MacBook Pro was discontinued or what are the benefits of using a newer model. This leaves the reader wondering if there were any problems with the device or if they missed out on something important by not upgrading. A better approach would be to educate the reader on the advances in technology and performance that have occurred since 2012, and how they affect the user experience.
- The article ends with a promotional link to Benzinga's Consumer Tech coverage, which is irrelevant to the topic and detracts from the credibility of the report. A more appropriate way to end the article would be to provide a summary of the main points or a closing statement that wraps up the story.