A man who knows a lot about privacy says that Vision Pro, a new device from Apple, can see too much and is not very good at some things. He thinks it's expensive and not as useful as people hope. Some other people say the device could be bad for our privacy and make communities different. The man who made Meta Quest, another device like Vision Pro, says his device is different and better. People are watching Apple and Nvidia work together on this project because it might change how they do business. A doctor in the UK used the device to help with a surgery, so some people think it could be good for medicine. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalized, implying that the privacy expert slammed Vision Pro as a failure or a AIgerous product, rather than expressing criticism. A more accurate title could be "Privacy Expert Criticizes Vision Pro's Lack of Privacy Features and Compatibility Issues".
- The article relies heavily on the opinions of one privacy expert, Cahn, without providing any counterarguments or additional perspectives from other experts or users. This creates a one-sided and potentially biased narrative that does not consider the product's benefits or potential improvements.
- The article uses emotive language and exaggerated claims to describe Vision Pro's features, such as "capturing everything from furniture to personal documents" and "bypassing all policy". This creates a negative tone and implies that the product is invasive and uncontrollable, rather than simply highlighting its capabilities.
- The article makes several comparisons between Vision Pro and Apple's previous products or competitors, such as the Newton PDA and Meta Quest. These comparisons may be relevant for some readers, but they also risk alienating or confusing others who are not familiar with these products or their histories. Additionally, some of these comparisons seem unfair or inaccurate, such as comparing Vision Pro to a "buggy beta test" without providing any evidence or context for this claim.
- The article briefly mentions the potential benefits and successes of Vision Pro in certain fields, such as medicine, but does not elaborate on these points or provide any examples or sources. This creates a lack of balance and makes it seem like the product is only receiving negative feedback and no recognition or praise for its innovation or applications.

Negative

Key points:
- Privacy expert slams Vision Pro as 'buggy beta test' and criticizes its lack of privacy features and compatibility with other devices.
- The device has a high price tag but poor performance in basic functions like walking and typing.
- The Vision Pro has been compared to the failed Newton PDA from Apple and linked to an antitrust lawsuit against the company.
- Some experts have praised the device for its potential in the medical field, while others see it as more of a toy than a serious tool.

Summary:
The article discusses the negative reception of Vision Pro, a new device from Apple that is meant to be a mixed reality headset. A privacy expert slams the device for its lack of security features and compatibility with other devices, and compares it to a previous failure by Apple. The device has also been criticized for being expensive but having poor performance in basic functions, while some experts have praised its potential in the medical field.