Instagram is a place where people can share pictures and videos. Sometimes, Instagram makes new things to make it more fun or interesting. But these changes sometimes make it hard for the people who make the pictures and videos (called creators) to talk to their friends and get money from doing this. Some of the new things that Instagram made are not helpful and cause problems for the creators. This makes them unhappy because they think Instagram should focus on helping them connect with others and solve problems instead of making new things that make it more confusing. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Instagram's new features are directly hurting creator income, when in reality, there may be other factors involved, such as the economy, competition, or changes in consumer preferences. A more accurate title could be "Instagram's Update Dilemma: How New Features May Affect Creator Income".
2. The article relies heavily on anecdotal evidence and quotes from a single creator, Joel Bervell, without providing any quantitative or statistical data to support the claims. This makes the argument less convincing and credible, as it does not account for the diversity of experiences and opinions among Instagram creators. A more rigorous analysis would involve surveying a larger sample of creators, collecting data on their engagement rates, revenue, and satisfaction with Instagram's features, and comparing them before and after the updates.
3. The article focuses mainly on the negative aspects of Instagram's new features, such as Meta Verified and Reels Bonus, without acknowledging any potential benefits or advantages they may offer to creators. For example, Meta Verified could provide creators with more visibility, authenticity, and protection from impersonation, while Reels Bonus could incentivize them to create more engaging and original content. The article should also consider the trade-offs and opportunities that these features present for creators, rather than dismissing them as disappointing or frustrating.
4. The article blames Instagram's management for not listening to its users, without considering the possibility that some creators may have unrealistic expectations or resistance to change. The article should also explore how Instagram's updates are driven by market demand, competition, and technological innovation, and how they align with Meta's overall vision and strategy. This would provide a more balanced and nuanced perspective on the relationship between Instagram and its creators.