Sure, I'd be happy to explain this in a simple way!

Imagine you have a special book that shows things happening very smoothly and quickly. This is what a "higher refresh rate" does on an iPhone screen.

Right now, Apple's regular iPhones (not the expensive Pro ones) show movies and games at 60 pictures per second, which is like flipping pages in your book 60 times every second. But the new ones might show things at 120 pictures per second, so it's like flipping twice as fast!

This makes everything look smoother and more fluid, like real life! It's also better for playing games because movements happen faster and more smoothly on the screen.

So, this means that next year's iPhones (the ones they might call "iPhone 17") could show things happening more smoothly than before, making them even cooler to use!

Does that make sense? Read from source...

Based on a critical review of the provided text, here are some potential issues and suggestions for improvement:

1. **Inconsistencies in Information**:
- The article mentions a leak suggesting that iPhone 17 Pro Max might have 12GB RAM, but it also states that "Novatek’s OLED technology could play a crucial role... for the iPhone 17 Air," which seems inconsistent as the Air isn't mentioned earlier. It's unclear if this is referring to the same device or two different models.

2. **Lack of Verification and Critical Thinking**:
- The article relies heavily on leaks without verifying their credibility. For instance, while citing Digital Chat Station as a source, it doesn't mention the leaker's track record or the reliability of previous leaks.
- It's stated that Ross Young from Display Supply Chain Consultants indicated certain features, but there's no link to his original statement for readers to verify.

3. **Bias**:
- The text seems tilted towards Apple Inc., presenting all leaks and rumors as confirmed facts without exploring possible alternatives or concerns (e.g., production issues, consumer demand, etc.).

4. **Rational Arguments Needed**:
- While the article mentions potential benefits of ProMotion technology, it doesn't delve into why this is significant for consumers or if there are any drawbacks.
- Similarly, discussing the broader implications of all iPhones adopting ProMotion displays could provide more context and value.

5. **Emotional Behavior**:
- The article uses exclamatory language ("Suggests...") and sensational phrases ("Play a crucial role") to present leaks, which might appeal to emotions rather than fostering critical thinking in readers.

6. **Lack of Context**:
- A comparison with competitor strategies (e.g., Samsung's displays) or a historical perspective on iPhone display technology could provide useful context.

Suggestions:
- Fact-check and verify information from reliable sources.
- Present both sides of arguments where applicable to maintain balance.
- Explain the implications of technological advancements in-depth.
- Use neutral language to present facts and avoid using sensational phrases.
- Provide context and comparisons to help readers understand the significance of the news.

The sentiment of the article is **bullish** and **positive**. Here are a few reasons why:

1. **New Technology**: The article discusses expected improvements in display technology for Apple's upcoming iPhone 17 series, which is typically viewed as positive news.
2. **Upgrade for Standard Models**: The potential upgrade to ProMotion displays for standard models suggests that there will be more high-end features available across the range, which can drive sales and create excitement among consumers.
3. **Innovation in Cooling Systems**: Mention of improved cooling systems for the iPhone 17 Pro Max indicates that Apple is addressing a common user concern, showing the company's responsiveness to customer needs.
4. **AI Capabilities**: The expected improvement in on-device AI capabilities can open up new features and experiences for users.

These points contribute to an overall bullish and positive sentiment about the potential future of the iPhone series. There are no significant negative or bearish sentiments expressed in the article.