A big company called AT&T had some problems. A bad person stole private phone call and text message information from many people who use AT&T. AT&T decided to give the bad person money to delete the stolen information. They paid the bad person around $400,000. Some people think it's not a big problem for AT&T because they have a lot of money. Read from source...

The AT&T report is a typical corporate scandal with many moving parts. It is disconcerting that AT&T allegedly paid a hacker $400,000 to delete stolen data, but it's also interesting to see how companies like AT&T deal with cybersecurity threats.

One of the more questionable aspects of the report was the hacker's ability to delete the stolen data. This was evidenced by a video provided by the hacker, but the authenticity of the video remains uncertain. If the hacker indeed had the power to delete the data, it raises questions about the company's data protection systems and their ability to prevent such incidents.

Another inconsistency is that the hacker provided a Bitcoin wallet address that corresponded with a transaction that matched the ransom payment. However, blockchain analysis company Chainalysis Inc. could not determine if AT&T made the initial Bitcoin payment. This raises questions about the transparency of the transaction and whether AT&T was indeed the one who made the payment.

Furthermore, the relatively small ransom payment of $400,000 compared to other high-profile data breaches is irrational. This indicates that AT&T may not have taken the threat seriously or had a flawed risk assessment process.

Overall, the report sheds light on the vulnerabilities of large corporations like AT&T and the measures they take to protect their data. However, it also highlights the inconsistencies, biases, and irrational arguments that are often present in corporate scandals.

neutral

Analysis: The article discussed an incident where AT&T allegedly paid a hacker around $400,000 to delete stolen data. However, the same incident might not cause significant financial damage to AT&T as the amount paid was relatively small compared to ransom demands and payments seen in other high-profile data breaches. The overall sentiment of the article is neutral.