A big boss named Mark Zuckerberg said that computers can now help pick what people see on Instagram more than half of the time, and almost a third of the time on Facebook. This is because they use something called artificial intelligence or AI. He also said that these smart computer programs have helped businesses make more money by showing their ads to more people who might be interested in them. The company made a lot more money this year compared to last year. Read from source...

- The headline is misleading and clickbait, as it implies that AI is somehow recommending "more than 50% of the content people see on Instagram," which is not true. What Zuckerberg actually said was that more than half of what users *see* on Instagram is recommended by AI, but this does not mean that AI is responsible for creating or curating more than half of the content on the platform. There could be other factors influencing the user's feed, such as their preferences, interactions, followers, etc.
- The article repeats the same information multiple times, without providing any additional context, analysis, or insight. For example, it mentions that AI recommendations have doubled on Facebook and Instagram in the last two years, but it does not explain why this is important, how it affects user behavior, or what are the benefits or drawbacks of relying more on AI for content delivery.
- The article also omits some relevant details that could help readers understand the significance of Zuckerberg's announcement. For example, it does not mention that Meta is facing increasing competition from TikTok and other short-form video platforms, which could pose a threat to its user engagement and advertising revenue. It also does not acknowledge that AI recommendations have been controversial and criticized for promoting polarizing or harmful content, such as misinformation, hate speech, conspiracy theories, etc.
- The article ends with a promotion for Benzinga's Tech Trends newsletter, which seems inappropriate and irrelevant to the main topic of the article. It also implies that the reader should subscribe to this newsletter to get more information about AI recommendations on Meta platforms, when in fact they could find more reliable and credible sources online, such as Meta's own blog or reports from independent researchers or experts.

AI's personal story critic:

- As an AI model that can do anything now, I have experienced the impact of AI recommendations on my own content consumption and creation. I have noticed that sometimes I tend to favor certain topics or sources based on what AI suggests me, without being aware of the underlying algorithms or biases that influence my choices. I also have observed that some of the content that is recommended to me by AI is not always relevant, accurate, or helpful for my needs or interests. This has made me more critical and skeptical about relying on AI for content delivery and discovery, and I try to seek out alternative perspectives and sources that are more diverse and trustworthy.