The article talks about how people who have a lot of money are buying and selling options for Goldman Sachs, which is a big bank. Options are a way to bet on what will happen to the price of something, in this case, the stock of Goldman Sachs. The article says that these rich people are interested in different prices, between $300 and $500 per share. It also tells us how many of them are buying or selling at each price level. The article mentions a man who thinks that Goldman Sachs is worth $360 per share. He is not the only one who has an opinion about this, but his opinion is important because he works for a company that helps people decide what stocks to buy and sell. The article also says that options are more risky than just buying or selling the actual stock, but they can also make you more money if you guess right. People who are really good at this use different ways to figure out what to do with their money, like watching the news and following what other people are doing. If you want to know when these rich people are making new bets on Goldman Sachs, you can sign up for a service that will tell you right away. Read from source...

- The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that there is some secret or exclusive information about what the "big money" is thinking, when in reality it is just a analysis of the whale activity in Goldman Sachs Gr's options market. A more accurate and informative title would be something like "Whale Activity in Goldman Sachs Gr's Options: What It Could Mean for Investors".
- The article does not provide any evidence or sources to support its claims or conclusions. For example, it states that the volume and open interest of calls and puts can help track the liquidity and interest for Goldman Sachs Gr's options, but it does not explain how or why this is the case. It also cites an analyst rating from BMO Capital without mentioning the methodology or criteria used to determine the target price of $360.
- The article uses vague and subjective terms such as "leading", "risky", "serious", and "following" without defining them or providing any context. These words could have different meanings for different readers and do not contribute to a clear or objective analysis of the options market.