The article talks about different kinds of jobs in the cannabis industry and how they will change in 2024. It also tells us about some websites that help people find these jobs. Some jobs pay more money now, and some new jobs are coming up that involve things like teaching, making products, or protecting plants. People who want to work in this field should think about what they like to do and what kind of benefits they want from their job. Read from source...

- The article is written in a very positive tone about the cannabis industry and its job opportunities, without mentioning any of the challenges or risks that potential job seekers might face. For example, it does not discuss the legal uncertainties surrounding cannabis at the federal level, the competition from illicit markets, the price fluctuations, the regulatory hurdles, the tax burdens, etc. A more balanced and realistic perspective would be to acknowledge both the pros and cons of working in this sector.
- The article relies heavily on surveys and reports that are not cited or verified, such as the one from Emerging Workforce. It also does not provide any evidence or data to support its claims about the growth rates, salary trends, benefits preferences, etc. A more credible and convincing argument would be to use reliable and transparent sources of information that can be independently checked and verified.
- The article makes several generalizations and assumptions about the cannabis job market, such as the emerging opportunities in 2024, without considering the regional, social, economic, and cultural factors that might influence them. For example, it does not specify which regions or countries are expected to have more demand for cannabis jobs, what kind of skills and qualifications are required, how competitive or accessible these opportunities are, etc. A more nuanced and specific analysis would be to account for the diversity and complexity of the cannabis job market across different contexts and scenarios.
- The article uses vague and subjective terms such as "trends", "insights", "sought-after positions", etc., without defining or explaining them clearly. For example, it does not clarify what criteria or methods were used to identify or rank the trending cannabis jobs, how these insights were gathered or validated, which sources of information or expertise were consulted, etc. A more transparent and coherent argument would be to provide clear definitions, explanations, and references for the key concepts and terms that are used in the article.