A big company called Baidu, which makes a smart computer helper named Ernie, lost a lot of money because people think that Ernie is connected to the Chinese army's own smart helper. This made some people in America worried and they might try to stop Baidu from working with them. Read from source...

1. The article is misleading and sensationalized by implying that there is a "physical link" between Baidu's Ernie and the PLA AI platform. This is an exaggeration that lacks evidence and creates unnecessary fear among investors.
2. The article relies on anonymous sources, which undermines its credibility and suggests a possible agenda behind the report. It would have been more responsible to verify the information with official statements from Baidu or the PLA.
3. The article does not provide any context or background about Ernie or the PLA AI platform, making it difficult for readers to understand their respective roles and functions in the AI ecosystem. This lack of understanding may lead to unfounded assumptions and prejudices against Baidu and its technology.
4. The article ignores the potential benefits of collaboration between Ernie and the PLA AI platform, such as advancing scientific research, enhancing national security, or promoting economic development. By focusing only on the negative implications, the article perpetuates a zero-sum mindset that hinders innovation and cooperation.
5. The article fails to mention any historical precedents or comparisons with other countries' AI policies and practices. This makes it hard for readers to evaluate the situation objectively and compare it with similar cases in other regions. It also overlooks the possibility of different interpretations and perspectives on the issue.
6. The article uses emotional language and tone, such as "plummets", "biggest drop", and "fear", which appeal to readers' feelings rather than their logic. This may influence their decisions and judgments in an unhealthy way, causing unnecessary volatility and panic in the market.
7. The article does not offer any constructive suggestions or solutions for the parties involved, nor does it invite dialogue or debate on the topic. Instead, it ends with a vague reference to Trump-era sanctions, which implies that history will repeat itself and that there is no room for negotiation or compromise.

### Final answer: AI's article story critics are based on an analysis of the logical structure, factual accuracy, rhetorical devices, and ethical implications of the original article. They aim to challenge the validity and reliability of the report and to encourage a more balanced and nuanced understanding of the issue.

1. Sell all Baidu shares immediately. This is a high risk, high reward strategy that requires you to act fast and trust your instincts. The reason for this recommendation is that the news of Ernie's link to PLA AI has caused a massive drop in Baidu's stock price, making it an attractive target for short sellers who are looking to profit from the company's decline.
2. Buy put options on Baidu with a strike price of $100 or lower. This is a low risk, high reward strategy that allows you to hedge your portfolio against further losses in case the situation worsens for Baidu. Put options give you the right to sell Baidu shares at a specified price within a certain time frame, and if the stock price falls below that level, you can exercise your option and sell your shares for a profit.
3. Invest in other AI-related companies or ETFs that are not linked to China or the PLA. This is a moderate risk, moderate reward strategy that diversifies your portfolio away from Baidu and its controversial ties to the Chinese military. Some examples of such companies or ETFs include Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG), Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT), NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA), and the Global X AI & Technology ETF (NASDAQ:KOIN).