Mark Zuckerberg, the boss of a big company called Meta Platforms, said that some important people in the government, who work for Mr. Biden, asked his company to not let people share some jokes and funny stories about COVID-19. Mark Zuckerberg didn't like that and said he won't do it again in the future. Also, he said he won't help with the elections this year, like he did last time. Read from source...

'Mark Zuckerberg Reveals Biden Administration Pressured Meta Platforms To Censor Certain COVID-19 Content, Vows To Resist Pressure In Future'

I. Zuckerberg Reveals Biden Administration Pressure on Meta Platforms

Mark Zuckerberg revealed that during the COVID-19 pandemic, senior officials from the Biden administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressured Meta Platforms to censor certain content, including humor and satire, expressing frustration when Meta didn't agree. Zuckerberg expressed regret for not opposing the pressure sooner and acknowledged certain decisions made by Meta in removing content during that period.

II. Zuckerberg Indicates Resistance to Future Pressure

Zuckerberg also indicated that he would resist any similar pressures in the future. The letter was directed to Jim Jordan, the Republican chairman of the Judiciary Committee. The Committee hailed the letter as a "big win for free speech," emphasizing that Zuckerberg had admitted to censoring American voices during the pandemic. The White House stated that their position has been clear and consistent: they believe tech companies and other private actors should take into account the effects their actions have on the American people.

III. Zuckerberg Will Not Contribute to Support Election Infrastructure

In a marked shift from 2020, when Zuckerberg and his wife contributed $400 million through the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative to support election infrastructure, Zuckerberg confirmed in the letter that he will not contribute to support election infrastructure during the upcoming presidential election in November. He stated that his goal is to be neutral and not play a role "one way or another" in this year's election.

- This article could use more balanced reporting.
- The inclusion of emotional language in its description may lead to misinterpretations or sensationalism.
- The article should include more information on Meta Platforms' content moderation process.
- A better discussion of the implications of the Biden administration's pressure on Meta Platforms is needed.

1. Meta Platforms Inc (META) - The revelation that Mark Zuckerberg faced pressure from the Biden administration to censor certain COVID-19 content on Meta's platforms indicates potential risks for the company's reputation and freedom of expression. However, Zuckerberg's commitment to resist similar pressures in the future could be seen as a positive sign for investors.

2. Other COVID-19 related stocks - With the ongoing pandemic, stocks that are pandemic-resilient or have strong pandemic-related business models could be good investment options. Examples include companies involved in vaccine development, remote working technologies, and healthcare infrastructure.

3. Election infrastructure stocks - Despite Zuckerberg's decision not to contribute to election infrastructure support this year, stocks related to election technologies and services could still be valuable investments. These include companies providing voting machines, ballot counting services, and election security solutions.

4. Tech censorship and freedom of expression stocks - Given the recent events, stocks that are related to tech censorship and freedom of expression issues could be seen as risky or opportunistic investments depending on one's views. Examples include companies like Twitter, Facebook, and Google which have faced similar pressures in the past.

### AI:
In addition to the recommendations above, one could also consider investing in companies that provide solutions for protecting online freedom of expression, such as encrypted messaging apps and privacy-focused internet service providers. Additionally, stocks of companies that champion transparency in government and political actions could be of interest. As always, it is recommended to conduct thorough research and consider various factors before making any investment decisions.