OpenAI made a new tool called Sora that can make videos from words. It's very cool, but it still has some problems and needs more testing. Sometimes, it can make mistakes or show bad things in the videos. They are working with artists to figure out how to use it better. This is important because video technology can be used for good or bad purposes, so they want to make sure Sora is safe and helpful. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized. It suggests that Sora is trying to replace human filmmakers, which is not the case. Sora is a tool for content creators and researchers, not a direct competitor to them.
2. The article claims that Sora is "groundbreaking", but does not provide any evidence or examples of how it differs from other existing video generation models, such as OpenAI's own GPT-3.
3. The article focuses too much on the potential misuses and limitations of Sora, without acknowledging its potential benefits and applications for various domains, such as education, entertainment, journalism, etc.
4. The article uses vague terms like "edge cases", "inaccurate videos", "illicit or harmful content" without defining them clearly or providing any concrete examples of what they entail. This makes the discussion abstract and confusing for readers who are not familiar with the technical aspects of video generation AI.
5. The article mentions Google Gemini as a rival to Sora, but does not explain why or how it is different from Sora in terms of functionality, performance, ethics, etc. This creates a false impression that there is only one alternative to Sora in the market, which is not true.