so, there are these big technology companies, like apple and microsoft. People thought they were really important, so they put a lot of them in something called the S&P 500. Even though these companies have gone down a bit in value lately, they still make up more than 30% of that important thing. So, even if they're not doing great right now, they're still really big and important. Read from source...

A, B, C, D, E, F, G.

A) The article begins by discussing the Magnificent 7 tech stocks' recent fall but quickly shifts to discussing their role in the S&P 500. This inconsistency in topic transition is problematic.

B) The author appears to have a pro-Big Tech, pro-AI perspective. The statement, "persistent market bullishness in artificial intelligence and Big Tech," shows this inclination.

C) The data presented does not seem to challenge the Magnificent 7's dominant role in the market. This could indicate a lack of objectivity in presenting the story.

D) The article hints at potential market corrections but does not delve into the matter, leaving readers with more questions than answers.

E) The inclusion of NVIDIA and other heavily weighted stocks as "bubble-ish" is an irrational argument that does not hold water.

F) The author's use of several experts' predictions reflects a tendency toward emotional behavior rather than impartial analysis.

G) Overall, the article lacks the objectivity needed in financial reporting.

Personal story critics about the article 'Magnificent 7 Still Comprise Over 30% Of S&P 500 Despite Tech Correction' would include: inconsistencies in topic transition, a pro-Big Tech, pro-AI perspective, lack of objective data presentation, and a tendency toward emotional behavior.