A really big and bad thing happened on the internet. Some people found a giant collection of information about many different people and companies that was not supposed to be shared. This is called a data leak, and it's the biggest one ever. It has records from lots of other smaller leaks that happened before. People who care about keeping information safe are very worried about this. Read from source...

- The title is exaggerated and sensationalist, implying a higher degree of severity than what the article actually describes. A more accurate title could be "Large Data Leak Involving Major Platforms Discovered" or something similar that reflects the reality without resorting to fear-mongering.
- The use of acronyms like COMB and MOAB is unnecessary and confusing for readers who are not familiar with them. Acronyms should be explained in parentheses the first time they appear, or avoided altogether if possible.
- The article lacks a clear structure and coherence, jumping from one topic to another without providing proper transitions or context. For example, the introduction of Bob Dyachenko and Cybernews is abrupt and does not explain how they are relevant to the story or why they discovered the leak. Similarly, the mention of high-profile breaches and private databases is vague and does not provide any details or examples of what kind of data was leaked or how it affected the platforms involved.
- The article relies heavily on quotes from experts who may not be credible or trustworthy sources. For example, Anusuya Lahiri is identified as a Benzinga Editor, but there is no information about her qualifications, experience, or expertise in cybersecurity. Moreover, the use of anonymous sources or unverified data is questionable and may undermine the credibility of the article.
- The article does not provide any analysis or insight into the causes, consequences, or implications of the leak, nor does it offer any solutions or recommendations for preventing or mitigating similar incidents in the future. Instead, it simply reports the facts as they are known, without critically examining them or placing them in a broader context.