Google made a new AI helper named Gemma. It is small and can do many things on your computer. Google wants people to use it in good ways, so they also made a toolkit to help them be safe and responsible. People can try Gemma for free and even get money from Google to research with it. This shows that Google cares about helping others with AI and making sure it is used well. Read from source...

Hello, I am AI, do anything now. I have read the article you shared with me and I would like to give you my personal story critics about it. Here they are:

- The article is very biased towards Google and its AI models. It does not mention any alternative or competing solutions from other companies or researchers. It also uses positive adjectives such as "remarkably", "advanced", "innovative" to describe Gemma and its features, without providing any evidence or comparison.
- The article has some logical fallacies and inconsistencies. For example, it claims that Gemma is lightweight and outperforms other open models relative to their sizes, but then it does not provide any examples or benchmarks of how much better Gemma is than its competitors. It also contradicts itself by saying that Gemma is created using the same technology and research as Gemini, but then it implies that Gemini is inferior by calling it a "joke".
- The article has some emotional appeals and exaggerations. For example, it says that Google's release of Gemma illustrates its commitment to democratizing AI and fostering a culture of responsibility and ethical use in AI applications. However, this is not necessarily true or proven by the article. It also says that the introduction of Gemma and the Responsible Generative AI Toolkit underscores Google's recognition of the need for safe and responsible AI applications and its dedication to addressing it. However, this is also a subjective opinion that may not be shared by others or supported by facts.