A big company called Goldman Sachs had some important people buy or sell things that can change the value of the company's stock. This is not normal and it makes other people think something big might happen with the company soon. Some people think this means the company will do well, while others think it means the company will do poorly. Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that there was some unusual or suspicious activity on Goldman Sachs options, but does not provide any evidence or explanation for why it is unusual or relevant to the readers. A more accurate and informative title could be "Some Wealthy Investors Show Interest in Goldman Sachs Options".
2. The article body starts with a vague statement about investors with a lot of money, but does not specify who they are, how much money they have, or what their motives are. This creates confusion and curiosity, but also undermines the credibility of the source. A more clear and concise introduction could be "We noticed some large options trades on Goldman Sachs shares today, which may indicate a bullish outlook from certain investors".
3. The article relies heavily on speculation and hearsay, rather than factual data or analysis. For example, the statement "it often means somebody knows something is about to happen" is baseless and unfounded, as there could be many other reasons for such trades, such as hedging, arbitrage, or personal preferences. The article also does not provide any sources or references for its claims, which makes it hard to verify or trust. A more rigorous and objective approach could be "We analyzed the options trades using our proprietary algorithms and found some patterns that suggest a bullish sentiment among certain investors. Here are the details of the trades and the possible implications".
4. The article uses emotional language and tone, such as "should know", "this isn't normal", and "so how do we know". This appeals to the readers' curiosity and fear, but also manipulates their emotions and biases. A more neutral and factual tone could be "Here are some options trades that caught our attention on Goldman Sachs. We will explain what they mean and why they matter for investors".
5. The article ends abruptly and incomplete, with a sentence that does not make sense ("Out of all of the special options we uncovered, 5 are puts, for a total amoun"). This leaves the readers hanging and unsatisfied, as they do not get to see the full picture or conclusion. A more satisfying and coherent ending could be "Out of all of the special options we uncovered, 5 are puts, for a total amount of $X million. We will update you on any further developments or changes in the market".