Apple is sending out their new Vision Pro headsets to people who ordered them before they were available. The headsets will arrive on Feb. 2 when everyone else can buy them too. Read from source...
1. The article starts with a misleading statement that Apple has reportedly commenced shipping for pre-orders of its Vision Pro. This implies that the information is not confirmed or official, yet it appears as if it is factual and authoritative. A more appropriate way to phrase this would be "Apple is expected to begin shipping Vision Pro headsets soon."
2. The article uses vague terms like "the first batch of pre-orders" and "customers are able to track their orders on the UPS website," without providing any specific details or numbers regarding the quantity, distribution, or location of these shipments. This creates a sense of uncertainty and mystery around the situation, which may appeal to some readers but also leaves them with unanswered questions.
3. The article mentions that order statuses on Apple's website may still reflect as "preparing to ship," because of the company's policy of updating shipping status closer to the official release date. This statement is unnecessary and irrelevant, as it does not add any value or insight to the main topic of the article. It only serves to remind readers that they should not expect their orders to be updated until later.
4. The article includes a quote from Ming-Chi Kuo, who is described as "TF International Securities' tech analyst." However, this information is already implied by the source of the quote, and there is no need to repeat it. Additionally, the use of full names for both the analyst and his firm makes the sentence sound awkward and formal, when a simpler and more concise alternative would be "According to TF International Securities, the Vision Pro sold between 160,000 to 180,000 units during its first pre-order weekend."
5. The article ends with a statement that Apple is aiming to have all pre-orders delivered on the official launch day, which is Feb. 2. This is redundant and unnecessary, as it was already mentioned earlier in the article that customers can expect their orders to be delivered by then. It also does not provide any new or interesting information about the Vision Pro or its potential impact on the market.