A long time ago, a group of people started an AI company called OpenAI. They wanted to make smart computers that can help humans in many ways. One of the people who helped start the company is named Elon Musk, but he left after some time. He also had some disagreements with other people who stayed in the company and how they were running it.

Recently, Elon Musk said that OpenAI did not follow some rules that they agreed to when they started the company. He wanted them to stop doing what they are doing and give him back some of his money. But OpenAI said that those rules were not real and Elon Musk was wrong. They also called his AI company a "lie" because it is not really open-source, which means anyone can use its code for free.

Some people think that Elon Musk is just upset because he left the company and his new AI company is not doing as well as OpenAI. Others think that he is trying to make a bigger company by joining with another one called Alphabet Inc., which also works on AI. But so far, nothing has happened and both companies are still working separately. Read from source...

The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that OpenAI rubbishes the non-profit founding agreement as fiction, but in reality, it was Sam Altman who dismissed Elon Musk's lawsuit based on that agreement as baseless and fictional. The author should have been more accurate and fair in representing both sides of the conflict.

The article also uses quotes from Vinod Khosla to characterize Musk's decision to sue OpenAI as a "salve on a bruised ego". This is an unfair and subjective interpretation of Musk's motives, which may not be fully understood by the author or the reader. It could also imply that Musk is acting out of spite or resentment, rather than genuine concern for his rights and interests as a co-founder of OpenAI.

Furthermore, the article mentions that Musk had once suggested a merger with Alphabet Inc., but was rejected by OpenAI. This fact seems irrelevant to the main issue at hand, which is whether OpenAI has violated its founding agreement and owes Musk any compensation or equity. The author may have included this information to cast doubt on Musk's credibility or motives, but it does not directly support or refute his claims.

The article also implies that OpenAI is competing with Alphabet Inc., by stating that its only path to compete with the tech giant was through a merger with Musk's AI venture. This is an oversimplification and generalization of the AI landscape, which has many other players and factors besides Google-owned Alphabet Inc. and OpenAI. The author should have acknowledged this complexity and diversity in the field, rather than presenting a binary and simplistic view.

Lastly, the article ends with a sarcastic remark by Musk, calling OpenAI a "lie". This could be seen as a personal attack on Altman and his team, rather than a substantive argument or evidence. The author should have been more objective and neutral in reporting this statement, rather than echoing or endorsing it.