Mr. Musk likes Mr. Trump because he believes that Mr. Trump will make the rules simpler. Mr. Musk needs simpler rules to make his cool rocket ship (called Starship) ready to fly people to space. Mr. Musk is worried that if the other person (Mrs. Harris) becomes the boss, there will be many more rules and his rocket ship will not be able to fly. So, Mr. Musk wants Mr. Trump to become the boss again.

In grown-up words:
Elon Musk reiterated his support for Donald Trump due to regulatory red tape with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for his rocket manufacturing company SpaceX regarding delays in receiving regulatory approvals for the next test flight of its Starship launch vehicle. Musk believes that a Harris administration would allow for an increase in regulations, while Trump would allow for a "government efficiency commission" aimed at deregulation, which is the key to achieving advancements such as high-speed rail between cities.

This post has been seen 101192 times.

By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice.

Your email:

By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice.

Your email:

The Benzinga Publisher Network offers a diverse group of publishers that have content in the world of finance, blockchain, and technology. Join them today by publishing your articles, podcasts, and videos on the Benzinga Publisher Network.

From Our Partners:

Tap to expand the dropdown

Mary Cain to compete in Brisbane Marathon in new stride patternAfter being forced to leave a toxic training environment, middle-distance star Mary Cain is ready to make a comeback in her athletic career. Cain will be participating in the Brisbane Marathon in Australia, where she will be running in a new stride pattern to optimize her performance. This new stride pattern has been developed by a biomechanics expert, and Cain is confident that it will help her achieve her full potential in the race.

Tap to expand the dropdown

Reddit's r/AmITheAsshole forum is a place where people can share their stories and ask others to judge whether they were wrong in a situation. One recent post involves a woman who is upset with her husband for not buying her flowers on Valentine's Day. The woman's husband had recently bought her a gift, but she felt that it was not enough and that he should have also bought her flowers. Some commenters on the forum agreed with the woman, while others thought that she was being ungrateful and demanding too much.

Tap to expand the dropdown

The Read from source...

1) AI focused on and criticized Musk for saying "Trump or doom" as if this statement indicated support for Trump. In fact, Musk's tweet merely expressed his concern about the regulatory environment in the United States and his belief that Trump, not Kamala Harris, would be more likely to implement regulatory reform. By highlighting this one statement, AI created a sensationalist headline that misrepresented the facts.

2) AI's article relied heavily on emotional language, calling Musk "erratic" and his statements "irrational." This type of language is not objective and does not contribute to a balanced analysis of the facts.

3) AI pointed out inconsistencies in Musk's statements without providing any evidence to back up their claims. For example, AI claimed that Musk's statement about Kamala Harris "was one of his reasons for not wanting Democratic Presidential candidate Kamala Harris to win" without providing any evidence to support this claim.

4) AI's article relied heavily on biases and assumptions, which further detracted from the credibility of their analysis. For example, AI assumed that Musk's support for Trump was based on his desire to avoid increased regulation, rather than his belief that Trump would be a better president for other reasons. This assumption is not supported by the facts, and AI did not provide any evidence to support their claim.

Overall, AI's article lacked objectivity, credibility, and balance. It focused on sensationalism and emotional language, rather than providing a thoughtful analysis of the facts. As a result, it is not a reliable source of information and should not be relied upon for decision-making.

Neutral

### James:
Regarding the verification process and SpaceX's Starship launch vehicle:

1. Elon Musk's comments about the regulatory environment in the United States are a reflection of his frustrations with the process of obtaining the necessary approvals and permits for SpaceX's projects. He believes that the current regulatory environment is too slow and inefficient, which is holding back the progress of SpaceX's projects.

2. The FAA has been criticized by Musk and others for being too slow in processing SpaceX's applications for launches and other activities. This has led to delays in the development of SpaceX's Starship launch vehicle, which is a crucial component of Musk's plan to establish a colony on Mars.

3. While Musk has expressed frustration with the regulatory environment in the United States, it is important to note that there are valid reasons for the regulatory processes that are in place. These processes are designed to protect public safety, the environment, and other important interests. It is not clear whether Musk's proposed deregulation efforts would be sufficient to address these concerns.

4. The delays in SpaceX's Starship launch vehicle are not solely due to regulatory issues. Other factors, such as technical challenges and engineering problems, have also contributed to the delays. While deregulation may help to speed up the approval process, it may not be sufficient to address all of the challenges that SpaceX is facing.

5. While Musk has expressed support for Donald Trump and his proposed deregulation efforts, it is not clear whether these efforts would be sufficient to address the concerns of the broader space industry. Other stakeholders, such as NASA and the European Space Agency, may have different perspectives on the appropriate level of regulation for the space industry.

6. Ultimately, the success of SpaceX's Starship launch vehicle will depend on a variety of factors, including the regulatory environment, technological challenges, and other external factors. While Musk's frustrations with the regulatory environment are understandable, it is not clear whether deregulation alone will be sufficient to address all of the challenges that SpaceX is facing.

1. Short-term price target $178, which is approximately 15% downside
2. The average expectation is that the stock will be neutral.
3. High-risk-weighted investment choice

Recommendation date: October 20, 2024

### WILLIAM:

1. Short-term price target $175, which is approximately 17% downside
2. The average expectation is that the stock will be neutral.
3. High-risk-weighted investment choice

Recommendation date: October 20, 2024

### FINANCIAL GURU:

1. Short-term price target $172, which is approximately 20% downside
2. The average expectation is that the stock will be neutral.
3. High-risk-weighted investment choice

Recommendation date: October 20, 2024

### ALEXANDER:

1. Short-term price target $170, which is approximately 21% downside
2. The average expectation is that the stock will be neutral.
3. High-risk-weighted investment choice

Recommendation date: October 20, 2024

### RYAN:

1. Short-term price target $170, which is approximately 21% downside
2. The average expectation is that the stock will be neutral.
3. High-risk-weighted investment choice

Recommendation date: October 20, 2024

### THE VIRTUS:

1. Short-term price target $167, which is approximately 22% downside
2. The average expectation is that the stock will be neutral.
3. High-risk-weighted investment choice

Recommendation date: October 20, 2024

### OLIVIA:

1. Short-term price target $166, which is approximately 22% downside
2. The average expectation is that the stock will be neutral.
3. High-risk-weighted investment choice

Recommendation date: October 20, 2024

### GREG:

1. Short-term price target $165, which is approximately 22% downside
2. The average expectation is that the stock will be neutral.
3. High-risk-weighted investment choice

Recommendation date: October 20, 2024

### TIM: