A big company called General Motors made more money than people thought they would. This made their stock go up and other companies that make things also did well. People think oil will cost more soon, so that's good too. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalized. It suggests that crude oil prices are moving higher, which implies an upward trend, but the article does not provide any evidence or data to support this claim. It also mentions General Motors earnings topping views, but does not explain how they did so or why this is important for investors.
- The article starts with a vague and irrelevant sentence about the stock market indices rising on Tuesday, without giving any context or reason for their performance. This seems like an attempt to fill space and create a positive tone, rather than providing useful information.
- The section on leading and lagging sectors is confusing and contradictory. It claims that communication services shares climbed by 2%, but then says materials shares fell by 0.5%. How can both of these statements be true at the same time? This shows a lack of clarity and consistency in reporting.
- The main focus of the article, General Motors earnings, is presented without any critical analysis or comparison to expectations or previous results. It simply states that they beat analyst consensus estimates, but does not explain how much they exceeded them by, or what factors contributed to their performance. This leaves readers with an incomplete and unsatisfactory picture of the company's situation.
- The article ends abruptly with a list of equities trading up, without any explanation or context. Why are these stocks going up? What is the connection to the rest of the article? How should investors react to this information? These questions remain unanswered.

AI's personal story critic: I found this article to be poorly written and lacking in substance. It seems like a hastily put together piece of content that tries to appeal to readers with catchy headlines and vague positive statements, without providing any real insight or value. The author does not seem to have a good grasp of the topic or the sources they are using. They also appear to be influenced by emotional biases and irrational arguments, rather than facts and logic. I would not trust this article as a reliable source of information for investors or anyone interested in the stock market.