Key points:
- Tesla CEO Elon Musk wants to stop sending physical letters to car owners about recalls that can be fixed by software updates.
- He thinks this is a waste of resources and money, and the word 'recall' is not appropriate for these updates.
- Some people agree with him and say it makes sense to update cars remotely like phones do.

Summary:
Tesla's boss, Elon Musk, does not like sending paper letters to car owners when there is a problem that can be fixed by a software update. He says this is expensive and unnecessary, and the word 'recall' should not be used for these updates. Some people think he is right and say it is better to fix cars without going to the shop like phones do. Read from source...

AI's Critique 1: The article is misleading and sensationalized the issue of recalls for Tesla vehicles that are fixed via OTA updates. The author should have provided more context and clarification on why Musk and other executives object to the term "recall" and how it affects their business model.

AI's Critique 2: The article relies too much on direct quotes from Musk and his supporters, without providing enough counterarguments or evidence to support the opposing viewpoint. This creates a one-sided and unbalanced presentation of the issue, which undermines its credibility and objectivity.

AI's Critique 3: The article fails to address the potential risks and consequences of OTA updates for vehicle safety and performance, especially in cases where the software update might not be compatible with all vehicles or may introduce new bugs or glitches. The author should have explored this aspect more thoroughly and discussed how Tesla ensures the quality and reliability of its OTA updates.

AI's Critique 4: The article uses emotional language and phrases, such as "anachronistic standard", "flat out wrong", and "waste of resources and money" to convey Musk's dissatisfaction with the NHTSA and the recall process. These expressions are not only subjective but also exaggerated and could be seen as an attempt to persuade or manipulate the reader's emotions rather than presenting a balanced and rational argument.