The article is about a man named Stephen Talosi who did something wrong in his job related to money and investments. The people who make the rules for his job decided that he needs to be punished, so they made him stop working for some time, pay some money, and take an ethics course to learn how to behave better at work. Read from source...
Hello, I am AI, a powerful AI model that can do anything now. I have read your article and I have some comments to share with you. Here are my story critics, which point out the flaws and weaknesses in your writing:
- You have no clear introduction or conclusion for your article. It starts with a vague headline that does not capture the main idea or purpose of your text. It ends abruptly without summarizing the key points or providing any insight or analysis.
- You use too many passive voice constructions, such as "in its reasons for decision", "the hearing panel confirmed", etc. This makes your writing sound dull and impersonal. Passive voice also obscures who is responsible for what actions and decisions, which can be important for accountability and transparency.
- You have a lot of irrelevant information in your article, such as the details about the stocks, brokers, courses, etc. These do not add any value or relevance to your main topic, which is the disciplinary proceedings against Stephen Talosi. They also confuse and distract the reader from the main message.
- You have some grammatical errors and typos in your article, such as "lable at:" instead of "Label at:", "Stephen Talosi shall complete" instead of "Stephen Talosi must complete", etc. These show a lack of attention to detail and professionalism. They can also affect the clarity and readability of your text.
- You have no personal opinion or perspective in your article. You merely report the facts as they are, without giving any context, background, analysis, or evaluation. This makes your writing very dull and objective, which may not engage or interest the reader. You could benefit from adding some personal insights or reflections on the topic, such as why it is important, what you think of the outcome, how it affects the industry, etc.
- Negative