This article is about a contest where people can show their ideas to make or sell things related to a plant called cannabis. The contest is organized by two companies named Benzinga and Curaleaf, who want to help small businesses owned by different kinds of people. If you win the contest, you can get money to grow your business and even more money if you do well at another event. To join the contest, you need to have a good idea for something with cannabis, not make too much money from it, and be part of a group that is different or not many people like them. The people who will decide who wins are looking for ideas that are special, have strong teams working on them, can make money, and can grow big. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and exaggerated, as the competition has already ended in 2024, which is impossible given that we are currently in 2021. This creates confusion and frustration for readers who want to apply or learn more about the event. A better title would be "Pitch Your Cannabis Business And Win Thousands In Prizes At This Benzinga & Curaleaf Competition - Past Event".
2. The article does not mention the date of the competition, which is crucial information for potential applicants and attendees. A simple sentence like "The event took place on May 31, 2024" would resolve this issue. Alternatively, if the article is meant to be a preview or promotion for future events, then it should indicate that clearly in the introduction.
3. The article does not provide any background or context about Benzinga or Curaleaf, which are both well-known names in the cannabis industry. Readers may wonder who they are and why they are sponsoring this competition. A brief introduction of each company would help establish credibility and relevance for the topic.
4. The article does not explain what criteria or factors will be used to evaluate the pitches, other than "competitive advantage, team strength, business viability and scalab". This leaves a lot of ambiguity and uncertainty for potential applicants, who may want to know more about how their ideas will be assessed. A more detailed description of the judging process would help clarify this aspect.
5. The article does not mention any specific prizes or rewards other than cash amounts, which may seem insufficient or unappealing for some applicants who are looking for more tangible benefits, such as mentorship, networking, exposure, etc. A list of potential benefits and perks would help entice more participants and showcase the value of the competition.