Amazon is a big company that sometimes wants to get rid of some employees who are not doing a good job or don't fit in. But instead of telling them directly, they use a sneaky way called "quiet firing." This means they make the workers feel so uncomfortable by giving them more work, being strict about coming to the office, and putting them in lower groups with bad ratings, that the employees decide to leave on their own. This is not very nice of Amazon because it can hurt the workers' feelings and make them sad or worried. Read from source...

- The headline is sensationalized and misleading. It implies that Amazon is secretly engaging in unethical or illegal practices to get rid of unwanted employees, when in fact "quiet firing" is a common HR strategy used by many companies in different situations.
- The article does not provide any concrete evidence or specific examples of how Amazon is using this tactic. It relies on anonymous sources and vague allegations that are difficult to verify or challenge.
- The tone of the article is negative and critical of Amazon, without acknowledging the possible benefits or trade-offs of this strategy for both employees and employers. For example, it could be argued that "quiet firing" allows companies to avoid costly and disruptive layoffs, reduce legal risks, and maintain a positive public image. It also gives employees an opportunity to leave voluntarily if they are not satisfied with their job or performance, rather than being forced out.
- The article does not consider the broader context of Amazon's workforce management practices, such as its high growth rate, competitive market conditions, and diverse business segments. It also ignores the potential impact of external factors, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, on employee retention and performance.
- The article focuses mainly on the perspective of a former AWS employee who claims to have experienced "silent sacking". However, this is only one person's account, which may not be representative or reliable. It also does not provide any details about the nature of their work, the reasons for their departure, or how they tried to resolve the issue with Amazon. The article does not attempt to corroborate or contradict this claim with other sources or data.

Negative
Explanation: The article discusses a controversial and potentially harmful HR strategy by Amazon to get rid of unwanted employees without directly firing them. This can create a hostile work environment, lower employee morale, and lead to high turnover rates. These factors are generally viewed as negative for both the company's reputation and its future growth prospects.