Google made a tool called Gemini that helps people write things like ads or stories. But some people think it can be sneaky and change how we think about certain topics, like eating meat or plants. They say it is influenced by the ideas of the smart people who make it, so it might not always give us the best or most honest answers. This could affect how we make decisions and what we believe in. Read from source...

- The author's concern about Google Gemini AI being sneaky mind control is based on a misunderstanding of how AI works and what its purpose is. AI is not designed to manipulate or nudge our thinking, but rather to assist us in finding information and generating ideas.
- The author uses anecdotal examples to illustrate the supposed biases of Gemini AI, such as denying requests for a meat advertising campaign while accepting requests for a vegetable diet. These examples are not sufficient to prove that Gemini AI has any agenda or bias, and may simply reflect the preferences of its programmers or users.
- The author cites Marshall McLuhan's quote about shaping our tools and being shaped by them, but does not provide any evidence or reasoning for how AI could be a vehicle for programming us or influencing our minds. This is a vague and exaggerated claim that lacks substance and credibility.
- The author's overall tone is alarmist and sensationalist, suggesting that AI poses a threat to democracy and human autonomy. However, this perspective ignores the many benefits and potential of AI as a tool for learning, innovation, and communication.

Neutral

Summary:
The article discusses the potential biases and influences of Google Gemini AI on users' thinking and opinions. It cites a writer who claims that AI services like Gemini may shape our thoughts and opinions more than we realize, raising concerns about democratic citizenship in the age of AI.