A lady named Cara worked very hard for a long time to help make cannabis legal. She believed in the cause and wanted to help people learn about it. But now, she is wondering if all her work was worth it because things are not going as well as she hoped in the cannabis industry. Read from source...

1. The author begins with a rhetorical question that implies regret or doubt about the worthiness of her activism and industry involvement. This sets up an uncertain tone for the rest of the article and may attract readers who are curious to find out what happened to make her feel this way. However, it also suggests a lack of confidence in her own choices and achievements, which could undermine her credibility as a cannabis activist and professional.
2. The author then proceeds to list her various roles and responsibilities within the cannabis industry, emphasizing how much time, energy, and passion she invested in it. This creates a sense of admiration for her dedication and commitment, but also raises questions about whether she balanced her personal life and well-being with her professional ambitions. Moreover, by focusing on the negative aspects of the cannabis industry, such as the drug war, the author may alienate some readers who are more interested in the positive aspects, such as the benefits of legalization, the innovation of products, or the social impact of the sector.
3. The author also reveals her naïve expectation that the cannabis industry would avoid replicating the failures of other American industries, especially in terms of gender inequality and corporate greed. This shows a lack of realism and awareness of the political and economic forces that shape any industry, regardless of its nature or ideology. It also implies that she was disappointed by the reality of the cannabis market and the behavior of some operators and investors, which may have contributed to her disillusionment and dissatisfaction with her career path.
4. The author ends with an incomplete sentence that suggests a cliffhanger or a twist in the story, but also leaves the reader wondering what exactly happened to make her question the worthiness of her activism and industry involvement. This creates a sense of curiosity and suspense, but also frustration and confusion, as the reader is not given enough information to form their own opinion or empathize with the author's perspective.

Negative
Summary: The article is a reflection by a cannabis activist who wonders if the fight for legalization was worth it. They discuss their 15 years of involvement in the industry and how they believed that cannabis would avoid replicating the failures of other American industries. However, they express disappointment with the current state of the industry, especially regarding profits and corporate culture.