27 years ago, a man named Steve Jobs came back to work at a company called Apple. Before that, he had worked there a long time ago but left after 12 years. When he came back in 1997, Apple was in trouble and not making enough money. But Steve Jobs made Apple better and more popular with cool products like iPhones, iPads, and Mac computers. Because of him, Apple became very successful and now makes lots of money. If someone had invested $1,000 when Steve Jobs became the boss in 1997, that investment would now be worth over $1 million! Steve Jobs is known for helping Apple become a big and important technology company. Read from source...

`Steve Jobs Came Back To Apple 27 Years Ago Today After 12 Years In Exile. If You Invested $1,000 When Jobs Became Apple CEO In 1997, Here's How Much You'd Have`.

1. The article, despite its title, fails to mention Steve Job's exile period clearly. The author skips over critical details about Steve Job's departure from Apple, how the company performed in his absence, and why he returned. It is unclear whether Steve Jobs returned to Apple voluntarily or whether he was begged to come back. This failure to explain the circumstances and reasons for Steve Job's exile and return makes the article incomplete and unreliable.

2. The title, "Steve Jobs Came Back To Apple 27 Years Ago Today After 12 Years In Exile," is inconsistent with the content of the article. The author talks about Steve Jobs' return to Apple, but fails to mention when exactly he returned. Also, the 12 years in exile period is never clearly defined, which makes the article unreliable.

3. The article seems to have a pro-Steve Jobs bias. The author fails to provide a balanced view of Steve Jobs' tenure at Apple, ignoring the challenges he faced and the mistakes he made. The article also ignores the contributions of other Apple executives, like Tim Cook, during Steve Jobs' absence.

4. The article uses emotional language to describe Steve Jobs' return to Apple, calling it a "turnaround" and a "redemption." This kind of language creates an unrealistic and exaggerated view of Steve Jobs' impact on Apple, ignoring the work of other Apple executives who played critical roles in the company's success.

5. The author makes an irrational argument by suggesting that if you had invested $1,000 in Apple stock in 1997 when Steve Jobs returned, you would have become a millionaire today. The author fails to consider other factors that could have impacted Apple's stock price, such as market trends, economic conditions, and the performance of other technology companies. The author's argument is overly simplistic and ignores important variables that could have influenced Apple's stock performance.

6. The article lacks personal stories or experiences about Steve Jobs' return to Apple. The author fails to provide any insights or anecdotes about what it was like working with Steve Jobs during his tenure at Apple. This omission makes the article less engaging and less informative.

Overall, the article is not reliable or informative, failing to provide a balanced, objective, and comprehensive view of Steve Jobs' return to Apple.