A big company called Zoom helps people talk to each other using video and computer screens. Some people think that the price of Zoom's shares will go up or down, so they buy something called options. These options are like a bet on what will happen to the share price. Some people who know a lot about this stuff have shared their opinions on how much Zoom's shares might be worth in the future. They think that Zoom's shares can be worth more than now, and they say "Buy". Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalist. It suggests that there are some "market whales" who have made huge bets on Zoom Video Comms options, implying a large amount of money and power behind these entities. However, the article does not provide any evidence or details about who these market whales are, how much they have invested, or what their motives are. This creates a false impression of scarcity and importance that may influence readers' expectations and decisions.
2. The article focuses on the volume and open interest of calls and puts within a narrow strike price range, but does not explain why these indicators are relevant or meaningful for Zoom Video Comms. It also does not provide any historical or comparative context to show how these metrics have changed over time or relative to other stocks in the same industry or sector. This makes it difficult for readers to understand the implications and significance of the data presented.
3. The article provides a brief description of Zoom Video Comms as a company, but does not mention any of its competitors, challenges, opportunities, or strategies. It also does not provide any analysis or commentary on how Zoom Video Comms's performance and prospects are affected by the options trades mentioned in the article. This leaves readers with an incomplete and unbalanced picture of the company and its market position.
4. The article cites one analyst who has upgraded his rating for Zoom Video Comms to buy, but does not provide any reasoning or evidence for this recommendation. It also does not mention any other analysts' opinions or ratings, nor does it disclose any potential conflicts of interest or incentives that the analyst may have. This creates a selective and subjective impression of expert opinion that may not be reliable or objective.
5. The article ends with a promotional message for Benzinga Pro, which is an online service that provides options trades alerts and other market news and data. It does not disclose any affiliation or partnership between the author and Benzinga Pro, nor does it acknowledge any potential bias or conflict of interest that may arise from this promotion. This creates a blatant and inappropriate attempt to influence readers' decisions by using the authority and credibility of the article as a platform.