Alright, imagine you're playing with your toys. PlayStation is like the big toy store where they sell and make all kinds of games that you can play on a TV or computer.

Now, there are also games you can play on your phone or tablet. That's what we call mobile gaming.

PlayStation wants to be better at making these mobile games too, so they hired two new leaders for their mobile team.

The first leader is Olivier Courtemanche. He will now take care of all the mobile games that PlayStation makes themselves. He used to share this job with someone else, but now he's the main person in charge. Before working at PlayStation, he had lots of experience making games at other big companies like Facebook and Disney.

The second leader is Justin Kubiak. His job is to find partners who want to work with PlayStation on mobile games. He used to do this part-time while also taking care of other things, but now it's his main job too. Before coming to PlayStation, he worked at Samsung and had experience in game development and partnerships.

Even though PlayStation closed a mobile game studio last month, they're still trying to improve their mobile games. They even put out a job listing looking for someone to help make a new PlayStation platform just for mobile games! Read from source...

I've analyzed the provided text and here are my findings on its quality, structure, and any potential issues:

1. **Structure**:
- The article follows a clear, inverted pyramid structure, starting with the most important information (new appointments at SIE) and then providing context and background.
- It is well-organized, presenting facts chronologically and connecting related events.

2. **Language and Style**:
- The language used is concise, informative, and easy to understand, making it accessible for a general audience interested in gaming news.
- Transitions between paragraphs are smooth, guiding the reader through the story.

3. **Critics/Potential Issues**:

- **Balance**: There's no apparent bias or lack of balance in the reporting. It provides relevant facts without favoring one side over another. However, it doesn't offer any quotes from involved parties (SIE representatives, Courtemanche, Kubiak), which could provide more color and context to the story.

- **Rational Arguments**: The article presents factual information based on LinkedIn updates and a GamesIndustry.biz report, so there are no irrational arguments present in the text itself. However, it doesn't delve into any critical analysis or interpretation of these leadership changes, which might be interesting for readers.

- **Emotional Behavior/Appeal to Emotion**: The article remains factual and does not attempt to appeal to emotions or evoke a particular emotional response from readers. It simply presents the news and relevant context in an informative manner.

4. **Quality**:
- The article is well-researched, with references to reliable sources (LinkedIn, GamesIndustry.biz) and relevant context provided.
- It doesn't rely on speculation but instead focuses on confirmed information.
- The use of concise language and clear structure makes it engaging and easy to read.

Overall, the article provides a clear and well-researched update on recent leadership changes at Sony Interactive Entertainment, with a good structure and balanced reporting. However, it could benefit from quotes or interpretations from involved parties to provide more depth and context to the story.

The sentiment of the article is **neutral**. Here are the reasons:

1. **Objective Reporting**: The article reports on leadership changes and plans by Sony Interactive Entertainment without expressing a strong opinion or bias.

2. **Both Positive and Negative Aspects Mentioned**:
- Positive: Appointments of experienced executives, expansion into mobile gaming.
- Negative: Closing of Neon Koi studio, challenges in mobile gaming efforts.

3. **Informative**: The article primarily provides information about the personnel changes, their backgrounds, and Sony's plans, rather than expressing a clear positive or negative sentiment.

So, while there are both positive and negative aspects mentioned, the overall tone is neutral as it simply reports the facts.