Two people who want to be the boss of America are still okay with bitcoin, a kind of digital money that isn't controlled by the government. Their names are Trump and RFK Jr. Other people who wanted to be the boss also liked bitcoin, but they stopped trying because they didn't think enough people would vote for them. So now it's just these two who like bitcoin and want to lead America. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized, implying that only two candidates remain who support Bitcoin, when in reality there may be more who have not publicly declared their stance or are hiding it for strategic reasons.
2. The article fails to provide any evidence or sources to back up the claims about Trump's and RFK Jr.'s positions on cryptocurrency and CBDCs, relying on anecdotal quotes and unverified statements from rallies and social media posts.
3. The article ignores other factors that may influence the candidates' views on crypto, such as their political agenda, campaign donors, personal beliefs, or external pressures from interest groups or lobbies.
4. The article does not address the potential implications of a CBDC for the future of money, privacy, and freedom in the US and globally, nor does it compare it to Bitcoin's decentralized and permissionless nature.

Bullish

Key points:
- The article reports on the shrinking pool of Bitcoin-friendly presidential candidates in the US after DeSantis and Ramaswamy exit the race.
- Trump and RFK Jr. remain as the only hope for the crypto world, according to the author.
- The article implies that a CBDC would be harmful to Bitcoin and freedom.
- The author praises Trump for his stance against a CBDC and shows appreciation for DeSantis' previous support of Bitcoin.

Summary:
The article has a bullish sentiment towards the remaining pro-crypto candidates, Trump and RFK Jr., who are seen as the sole defenders of Bitcoin and freedom in the presidential race. The author also expresses admiration for DeSantis' previous opposition to a CBDC and regret over his withdrawal from the contest. The article implies that a CBDC would be detrimental to Bitcoin and its innovation potential.