The article talks about how some big tech companies, like Apple and Microsoft, wanted their services to not be seen as "gatekeepers" by the European Union. A gatekeeper is a company that has a lot of control over what other people can do online. The EU said no to this idea for Apple's iMessage service, but it did not affect Apple and Microsoft's status as gatekeepers. This whole situation was about how these big tech companies don't want to share their power with others on the internet. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that Apple's iMessage escaped an antitrust threat when in fact it was never considered as one.
- The article uses vague terms such as "gatekeeper service" without defining them or explaining how they are relevant to the case. This creates confusion and misunderstanding for the readers who are not familiar with the DMA context.
- The article relies on unsubstantiated claims from Alphabet and Microsoft, who have their own interests in pushing for the DMA regulations that would affect Apple's dominance in the digital markets. These sources are not credible or objective enough to support the main argument of the article.
- The article ignores alternative perspectives and counterarguments from Apple and other stakeholders who argue that iMessage is not a gatekeeper service and should not be subject to the DMA regulations. This shows a lack of balance and fairness in reporting the issue.