This article talks about some big people who are betting a lot of money that a company called Eli Lilly and Co will go down in value. They use special agreements called options to make these bets. The writer thinks this is important because it might mean something big is going to happen with the company soon. Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that the big money is thinking negatively about Eli Lilly and Co, but it does not provide any evidence or reasoning behind this claim. A more accurate title could be "Some Big Money Traders Show Bearish Sentiment on Eli Lilly and Co: What Does It Mean?"
2. The article uses vague terms like "we noticed" and "somebody knows something is about to happen". These phrases create a sense of mystery and urgency, but they do not offer any concrete information or analysis to support them. A more transparent and objective writing style would be to provide specific examples of the options trades and their implications for the company's performance and stock price.
3. The article does not disclose its sources or methods for tracking the options history. This makes it hard for readers to verify the accuracy and reliability of the information presented. A credible article would include a clear citation of where the data comes from, how it is collected, and how it is interpreted.
4. The article focuses too much on the number and percentage of bullish and bearish trades, without explaining what they mean or why they matter. An options contract represents the right to buy or sell a certain amount of stock at a specific price within a certain time period. The value of an option depends on various factors such as the underlying asset's price, volatility, interest rates, and dividends. A simple comparison of the number of puts and calls does not capture this complexity or indicate the potential profit or loss for the traders involved.
5. The article mentions a put contract worth $29,144, but it does not explain what it entails or why it is significant. A put contract gives the holder the right to sell a specified amount of stock at a predetermined price (the strike price) until the expiration date. If the stock price is below the strike price on the expiration date, the holder can exercise the put and sell the stock at a profit. However, if the stock price is above the strike price, the holder can let the contract expire without selling the stock or sell it on the open market for any price. The article does not say who owns this put contract, when it was bought, how long it has until expiration, or what its relationship is to Eli Lilly and Co's performance and stock price.
6. The article mentions seven call contracts worth a total of $356,699, but it does not provide any details about them either. A call contract gives the holder the right to buy a specified amount of stock at a predetermined price (the strike price) until the expiration date. If the stock price is above the strike price on the expiration date, the holder can exercise the call

Bearish

Key points:
- Big money investors are betting against Eli Lilly and Co with a high percentage of bearish trades
- There is one put option and seven call options with a total value of over $385,000
- The options history shows that whales have been targeting Eli Lilly and Co for some time now

Summary:
The article suggests that big money investors are expecting a decline in the stock price of Eli Lilly and Co. They have taken a large number of bearish positions, including one put option and seven call options worth over $385,000. The options history also indicates that whales have been accumulating these contracts for some time, possibly anticipating negative news or events affecting the company.