Alright, imagine you have a big LEGO castle. You built it with help from a friend who gave you special, super strong blocks.

Now, your friend can't give you more blocks because someone said they can't. This means your castle won't grow as big or as strong as it could be.

But, you find another friend who has some pretty good blocks too. These new blocks might not be exactly the same as the ones from your first friend, but they're still really useful and help make your castle bigger and stronger than before.

This story is like what's happening with Huawei, Apple, and special chips (like those LEGO blocks). Huawei can't get some super strong chips from their first friend (U.S. companies) because of rules set by big bosses. So, they're finding new friends to help make better products. Read from source...

Based on the provided text about Huawei's Mate 70 and Apple's competition, here are some points of criticism:

1. **Inconsistency in Information:**
* The article mentions that Huawei's chips lag behind Apple's in power efficiency but then suggests that this difference might not matter as long as users can get through the day without worrying about charging.
* Later, it is stated that while Huawei's chips still trail Apple's, the gap has narrowed significantly. These statements seem inconsistent with each other.
2. **Bias:**
* The article starts by framing SMIC and Huawei as leveraging advanced technologies to compete with Apple, setting up a narrative favoring these companies.
3. **Irrational Arguments:**
* The assertion that users not having to worry about charging is sufficient regardless of power efficiency isn't necessarily true for all users, especially those who use their devices intensively or travel frequently. Additionally, battery life isn't the only factor in measuring a device's performance – speed, app support, and camera quality are also crucial.
4. **Emotional Behavior:**
* The article doesn't engage in any emotional expressions; however, it might evoke certain emotions in readers, such as excitement about new technology (Huawei's chips) or concern/tension around competition between major tech companies.

In terms of structure and content flow:

* The article presents a mix of business reportage, market analysis, and tech news. It could benefit from a clearer focus on one or two of these aspects.
* Transitions between topics (e.g., Huawei's Mate 70 to US sanctions against Huawei) could be smoother to help the reader understand the connection between them.

Based on the provided article, here are some sentiment points:

1. **Huawei**:
- Bullish: The Mate 70 is expected to put more pressure on Apple in China.
- Positive: Huawei plans to begin mass production of its new AI chip, indicating technological advancement and growth.

2. **Apple**:
- Bearish/Neutral: The article doesn't explicitly mention any negative aspects about Apple but implies competition with Huawei's upcoming Mate 70.

3. **Overall Sentiment**: Positive, as the article focuses on Huawei's advancements in technology and competition with a major player like Apple, without dwelling much on negatives or market threats.