A big company called Alibaba wants to build a new place in Vietnam where they can keep lots of computer information safe. They need this because the government there made some rules that say companies have to keep their data in the same country. Other big companies like Google and Amazon also had to follow these rules. By building their own place, Alibaba can make sure their data is more secure and save money too. Read from source...

- The headline is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Alibaba is chasing Vietnam because of Nvidia and Apple, when in reality, it is complying with the local law that requires data storage within the country. This creates a false impression that Alibaba is following a trend or imitating its competitors, rather than respecting the sovereignty and regulations of Vietnam.
- The article does not provide any evidence or sources to support the claim that Nvidia and Apple are chasing Vietnam. It simply states it as a fact without explaining why or how they are doing so. This is a poor journalistic practice that undermines the credibility of the article and the author.
- The article uses vague and ambiguous terms such as "boost control" and "meet local laws". What does these mean in concrete terms? How will Alibaba achieve these goals? What are the benefits and risks involved? The article fails to answer these questions and instead relies on generalizations and assumptions that may not be accurate or relevant.
- The article mentions that Alibaba rents server space from state-owned telecommunications companies, but does not explore the implications of this arrangement for Alibaba's business model, data security, customer trust, etc. It also does not mention any alternatives or challenges that Alibaba may face in constructing its own data center, such as legal hurdles, infrastructure constraints, competition from other providers, etc.
- The article cites AIg Minh Tam, Alibaba Cloud's solution architect lead, as a source of information, but does not disclose his affiliation or credentials. This raises questions about his objectivity and reliability as a spokesperson for Alibaba. It also creates a potential conflict of interest, as he may have a vested interest in promoting Alibaba's services and downplaying any negative aspects of its operations in Vietnam.
- The article ends with a sentence that suggests that building a data center in Vietnam will help Alibaba reduce costs and liability issues. However, it does not provide any evidence or analysis to support this claim. It also ignores the possibility that constructing a data center may entail higher expenses and risks for Alibaba, such as regulatory compliance, technical difficulties, security breaches, etc.
- The article is poorly structured and organized. It jumps from one topic to another without clear transitions or connections. It also lacks coherence and consistency in its tone and style. For example, it switches between the present tense and the future tense, it uses formal and informal language, it mixes facts and opinions, etc. This makes the article difficult to follow and understand.
- The article does not provide any context or

Neutral

Summary:
Alibaba plans to build a new data center in Vietnam to comply with local laws requiring data storage within the country and to meet increasing demand. This move is part of Alibaba's strategy to ensure better security and control over its data and potentially reduce costs and liability issues associated with renting server space from state-owned telecommunications companies Viettel and VNPT. The article also mentions that other major tech firms like Nvidia, Apple, and Amazon have faced similar challenges in Vietnam due to the 2022 law mandating data storage localization.