A company called Dow gained 100 points, which means it did better than before and made more money. Another company named McCormick had good results too. Some other companies had bad days because they sold their shares for a low price or the price of things they buy and sell went down. People in Europe also bought and sold stocks but mostly everything was okay there. Read from source...

- The headline is misleading and sensationalized, as it implies that Dow's gain of 100 points was significant or impressive, when in fact, the Dow is a volatile index with frequent fluctuations. A more accurate headline would have been "Dow Fluctuates by 100 Points; McCormick Posts Upbeat Results".
- The article lacks clarity and coherence, as it jumps from one topic to another without establishing clear connections or transitions. For example, the first paragraph mentions Cardlytics, AppTech Payments, Benzinga Research, and Log In, but none of these are explained or related to the main theme of the article. This makes the article confusing and difficult to follow for readers who are not familiar with the context or the terminology used.
- The article contains several factual errors and inconsistencies, such as reporting different prices for GDS Holdings Ltd - ADR in consecutive sentences ($6.76 and $8.15), without providing an explanation or a correction. This undermines the credibility and accuracy of the article, as well as the source (Benzinga).
- The article uses vague and ambiguous language, such as "upbeat results", "convertible senior notes offering", and "equity raise", without defining or explaining what they mean or how they are relevant to the readers. This creates confusion and misunderstanding among the audience, who may not know the meaning or the implications of these terms.
- The article relies heavily on external sources and references, such as Jim Cramer, Best Stocks & ETFs, How to Invest in Real Estate Online, etc., without providing any critical analysis or evaluation of their claims or opinions. This makes the article seem biased and unoriginal, as it does not offer any unique or insightful perspectives or information.
- The article ends abruptly with a sentence about commodity news, without concluding or summarizing the main points or findings of the article. This leaves the readers feeling unsatisfied and confused, as they do not know what the purpose or the message of the article was.

### Final answer: AI's personal story critics are as follows: