Someone wrote an article about what big people who buy and sell things called options are doing with a website named Pinterest. They found out that these big people are making special moves, which might mean they know something will happen soon. The writer tries to guess the possible prices of Pinterest in the next few months based on these moves. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that there is some unusual or suspicious activity happening with Pinterest options on May 14, but it does not provide any concrete evidence or explanation for why this is the case. A more accurate title could be "Pinterest Options Activity: Analyzing Recent Trades and Price Movements".
- The article uses vague and subjective terms such as "this isn't normal" and "something big happens", without providing any clear criteria or benchmarks for what constitutes normality or bigness. This makes it difficult for the reader to understand the author's point of view or evaluate the validity of their claims.
- The article focuses too much on the quantity and monetary value of the options trades, rather than their quality and significance. For example, it mentions that 9 uncommon options trades were spotted, but does not explain what makes them uncommon, or how they differ from typical trading patterns. It also emphasizes the total amount of money involved in the trades, which may be misleading or irrelevant, as some investors may use leverage or hedge their positions to reduce risk.
- The article presents a lot of data and statistics, such as expected price movements, volume, open interest, etc., but does not adequately explain how these metrics are derived, what they mean, or how they relate to the options trades or Pinterest's performance. For example, it mentions that the significant investors are aiming for a price territory of $36.0 to $49.0, but does not provide any context or rationale for why this is important or relevant.
- The article provides a brief overview of Pinterest's business model and market position, but it lacks depth and detail. It does not explore the company's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats, competitive advantages, or growth prospects. It also does not mention any recent developments or events that may have affected the company's performance or outlook.
- The article ends with a vague statement about Pinterest's "present market standing", but it does not provide any specific information or analysis on how the options trades relate to the company's valuation, profitability, liquidity, or competitiveness. It also does not indicate whether the author has any personal stake or bias in Pinterst's performance.