Alright, imagine you have two friends who started a big club together. Let's call them Sam and Elon.
At first, they worked really well together and the club grew to be very popular. But after some time, Elon thought that the club should focus on helping lots of people in a special way, while Sam wanted to make more money for themselves. Because of this disagreement, Elon decided to leave the club.
Now, years later, there's news that even though the club is doing really well and has many new friends, it might change some rules so that Sam can get a bigger share of the profits from the club's cool activities.
Elon sees this and says something like "Wow, I can't believe you're trying to do that, Sam!" And then Sam says that they are really proud that their club is doing good things for everyone, even if people might want to change some rules later on.
So, it's a bit like two friends arguing about what's best for their club and who should benefit the most from it.
Read from source...
Elon Musk's recent tweet, "Swindly Sam is at it again...", was likely a response to Sam Altman's praise of ChatGPT's lack of bias. Here are some aspects of Musk's implicit criticism:
1. **Inconsistency**: Musk might be highlighting the irony in Altman claiming ChatGPT as the least biased AI when OpenAI, the company he leads, also produces models like GPT-4 that have been criticized for biases and inaccuracies.
2. **Bias accusation**: The "Swindly" part of Musk's tweet could suggest that he believes Altman has a bias or is being disingenuous about ChatGPT's lack of bias. This could be tied to their ongoing rivalry, with Musk alleging OpenAI's prioritization of commercial interests over public good.
3. **Irrational argument**: The brevity and ambiguity of Musk's tweet might suggest an emotional response rather than a reasoned argument, which critics could attribute to Musk's aggressive tone in public disputes.
4. **Emotional behavior**: The use of a mildly insulting nickname ("Swindly Sam") suggests frustration or disdain, potentially indicating an emotional response from Musk, regardless of whether he has valid concerns about ChatGPT's biases or OpenAI's practices.
Based on the provided tweets and context, I'd rate the sentiment of this article as "negative," but it's more of a personal disagreement or tension rather than a bearish view on the companies involved. Here's why:
1. Elon Musk's tweet uses the phrase "Swindly Sam" to refer to Sam Altman, suggesting dismissiveness or disapproval.
2. The conversation revolves around past disputes and lawsuits between Musk (who left OpenAI) and Altman (the current CEO).
3. There's no positive sentiment or praise expressed in either tweet.
However, it's not a typical bearish sentiment that suggests negative future prospects for the companies involved. It's more a reflection of personal tension between two prominent figures in tech.